We’re not doing enough to end campus sexual assault

15

On January 18, 2015, around 1:00 a.m. two Swedish exchange students were riding their bikes through the Stanford University campus when they happened upon 20-year-old Brock Turner, raping an unconscious woman behind a dumpster. He’d led her away from a party she’d attended with her sister and was assaulting her both with his fingers and inanimate objects.
Turner ran when confronted, and the two men chased him down and held him until authorities came, with the help of some passerby; one of the two, when giving his statement to police, was brought to tears by what he had seen. A nurse attending to the victim noted she had sustained significant physical trauma, including “penetrating trauma.”
Regardless of the damning evidence mounted against Turner, due to a legal loophole in California’s legal definition of sexual assault, he was able to have two rape charges dropped completely.
California isn’t the only state with statutes in place that harm victims of sexual assault. In Idaho, there’s no law requiring universities to report campus sexual assaults to law enforcement – this is a legal loophole that allows too many students, particularly star athletes, to get away with infringing upon the human rights of their peers, leaving with consequences like academic suspension rather than prison time.
Turner was recognized as a “promising athlete” for his role on Stanford’s swim team – one of the first articles covering the case included his swimming times. To many, this was nothing more than insulting, considering the severity the crimes he’d committed. He’d come to be known in conversation as either the Stanford Swimmer or the Stanford Rapist, depending on the company one keeps. To his defenders, his athletic potential seemed to carry more weight than the safety of his victim.
On March 30, 2016, Turner was found guilty of three felony counts of sexual assault, for which the maximum sentence was 14 years. Due to the aforementioned failure in California’s state law, Turner walked away with a whopping six months in jail, followed by three years probation. He ended up serving only three months of his sentence, being released early for “good behavior.” Now he’s free to post horrific bullshit on Twitter, such as a (since deleted) tweet saying “Couldn’t have done this without my coaches! Aaah the good old days b4 SHE happened #swimlife #swimming #PartyHard.”
In a brief letter written by Turner’s father, his son’s heinous crime was referred to as “20 minutes of action,” which in his opinion hardly warrants the degree of criticism his family has since received, up to and including the armed protesters camped outside his house. The fact that his son has been banned from ever competing in the Olympics is, as he sees it, punishment enough. Joe Biden referred to this statement as “callous,” and to those watching the trial who sided with the victim, it served as proof that parents do indeed need to teach their sons not to rape.
On June 3, 2016, a victim-impact statement read aloud by the victim during the trial was published on Buzzfeed, and within four days it had been shared over 11 million times. It served as a vivid account of her suffering, and detailed the many times she was failed by the legal system during her trial. The letter was so widely distributed that even Vice President Joe Biden penned a response, titled “An Open Letter to a Courageous Young Woman,” wherein he condemned the culture that allowed this situation to happen, stating that it’s “a failure that lies at all our feet.”
In response to national hysteria surrounding the incident, Stanford went so far as to ban hard alcohol from campus parties, ensuring this kind of thing will never happen again. Because, of course, rape is caused by vodka, booty shorts and being in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Smooth move, Stanford; there are problematic implications in initiating an alcohol ban as a response to sexual assault. Rape is not caused by alcohol – nobody else at that party did what Turner did, and they were all equally intoxicated. Rape isn’t caused by party culture, promiscuity or “mixed signals.” Rape is caused by rapists. Unfortunately, we occupy a culture that sees the title of “star athlete” as more character-defining than the title of “rapist.” Furthermore, an athlete is viewed as having more to offer a university than does a rape victim. It’s at least partly for these reasons that perpetrators of crimes similar to Turner’s are regularly able to avoid accountability.
The judge who oversaw the case, Aaron Persky – who is also Stanford alumni – gave Turner his absurdly merciful sentence on the grounds that prison would have a “severe impact” on him. True, serving hard time would have changed him as a person. Incarceration tends to do that to people. In that sense, Aaron Persky was right; but, due to the severe impact sexual assault has had on so many people in America, over 1 million were moved to sign a petition meaning to remove him from the bench.
This isn’t the first time Persky has astronomically failed at bringing justice to a rape victim. In 2011, he presided over a lawsuit against eight members of the De Anza college basketball team, who had been caught gang-raping an unconscious woman. Three members of the women’s soccer team happened upon the scene and intervened, taking the 17-year-old victim to the hospital, where it was discovered that she was covered in someone else’s vomit. The crime scene wasn’t investigated until nearly 23 hours after the victim arrived at the hospital, and no arrests were made, despite a second woman coming forward and stating she too had been assaulted by members of the De Anza basketball team. During the trial, Persky allowed into evidence “suggestive” photos of the victim at a party, taken a year after the rape occurred, which were supposed to negate her claim of suffering from post traumatic stress disorder. The jury found the defendants not liable, and nobody was charged with a crime. Persky certainly has a history of extending privileges to male rapists and college athletes at the expense of their victims; hopefully, though, Brock Turner will be the last, as Persky has since stepped down from hearing criminal cases.
I know what you’re thinking. “Sure, this is upsetting, but what does it have to do with me?” Well, let me lay it down for you. If Brock Turner being arrested and brought to trial resulted in a three month vacation one could hardly call “justice,” imagine if this case had been handled exclusively by campus security. It’s not far-fetched to say that Turner would have skirted retribution with a mere referral to Human Resources, or some other such nonsense. Unfortunately, even on Boise State’s campus, that’s a nightmarish potential outcome that time and time again presents itself as a reality.
Sexual assault is an epidemic. It’s estimated that one in five women and one in sixteen men will be sexually assaulted while in college; however, that number seems to many an absurd understatement, and very well may be, considering that rape is the single most underreported crime in the United States. Like it or not, this problem lives in our own backyard. Boise State has come under fire multiple times for giving inadequate response to reports of sexual assault – at least eight rapes, six reports of fondling and four cases of dating violence have been reported on campus in 2016. According to Boise State’s crime log, exactly zero of these reports have led to an arrest, nor have any of the seven rape cases from 2015, or the eight cases from 2014.
We can’t work to create a culture of consent on our campus through efforts such as bystander intervention training, while also working to sweep sexual assault under the rug. A university’s reputation cannot be prioritized over the safety of its students, nor can the reputations of its athletes. Boise State’s policy needs to change; if almost 90 arrests can happen in 2016, mostly due to drug related offenses, it’s fair to expect the same level of harshness to be imposed on sex offenders. A healthy, secure campus is one where rapists are held accountable for their actions, and justice is served to every victim who is brave enough to seek it.

Share.

About Author

15 Comments

  1. ___Brock Turner is more trustworthy than that girl ‘Emily Doe’, because Brock Turner speaks under his real name, while Emily Doe is just a PRETENTIOUS moniker; While someone hailed that girl as a hero and claimed to believe in her, I’d call her a COWARD and untrustworthy;

    ___ On top of all the mess, this girl would be very much insincere and untrustworthy to still remain anonymous, if she wants to have Ms. Michele Dauber / Mr. Jeff Rosen or anyone else to use her case to manipulate public opinion, she needs to show us her real identity to withstand public scrutiny;

    :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

    >>On CBSNews a commenter named ‘kateslate’ said: “Uh….he is the one who committed a crime. Not her.”
    ___This case was overblown to the whole society by a pact of fascists; While this girl hiding under a PRETENTIOUS moniker ‘Emily Doe’ was set up as an anonymous prop in this conspiracy; At this moment, Brock Turner is a victim to fascism persecution, but not a criminal;
    ___The purpose for the public to know her real identity is to see if her testimony under her real name can fit the background and can withstand public scrutiny; If her testimony can not withstand public scrutiny, he might not be as guilty as the jury found out, and she might not be as innocent as she claims; she needs to show us her real identity to see if her testimony can withstand public scrutiny under her real identity; So far she failed to do so; so her testimony carries no credibility to gain public sympathy or to manipulate public opinion; so the jury’s finding on Brock Turner’s guilty conclusion is in question in public opinion;

  2. ___Mr. Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Someone from inside of Stanford University must have given approval to the recent ‘heavier punishment on ‘Brock Turner’ and ‘Recall Judge Persky Campaign’, led by Mr. Jeff Rosen of Santa Clara District Attorney and Stanford Law Professor Michele Dauber, both of whom are like you being PRETENTIOUS and COWARDICE to such a public challenge___Mr. Marc Tessier-Lavigne, is that you or those fascists who tried to install you from inside of Stanford University who are behind such a conspiracy in this PHONY ‘heavier punishment on ‘Brock Turner’ and ‘Recall Judge Persky Campaign’? but Why sacrifice Brock Truner and Judge Persky while covering up the much heavier Gabriele Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case?___Cause it is those fascists (some listed in this public challenge) behind Gabriele Scheler who tried to help you THEFT Stanford Presidency through this fascism conspiracy, right?

    ___Mr. Marc Tessier-Lavigne, whatever, you do not deserve Stanford Presidency, you are a THEF, and once a THEF, always a THEF, as you are now; and this public challenge will follow wherever your name display;

  3. >>On Aug. 29. 2016 CNN: ”AB 2888 passed the state Assembly Monday by a unanimous 66-0 vote. It is headed to Gov.’s desk.…Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen said in June that he hoped the bill would “changes hearts and minds.” Senator Jerry Hill (D-San Mateo), Assemblymen Evan Low (D-Campbell) and Bill Dodd (D-Napa) are the three Northern Californian legislators behind the bill.”

    ………………………………………….

    Assemblywoman Catharine Baker / Victoria Henley, Commission on Judicial Performance / Kathleen Russell, Executive Director of the Center for Judicial Excellence / Barbara Kauffman, a family attorney in San Rafael / Hannah Beth Jackson, a Democrat from Santa Barbara, Senate Judiciary Chairwoman

    Woman can sexual assault man as well; In Gabriele Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case, this Criminal Suspect Gabriele Scheler kicked me, and then suddenly stabbed me with a pen from behind while I was facing the robot, and then she repeatedly kicked on my groin part; when I told her: ‘You got it, very painful’, she replied: “it’s not good for fertilizer, eh?” ___Isn’t that a typical sexual assault behavior? How could such obscene behaviors be ignored by those judicial officers?

    What do you legislators think about such lewd behavior? Why not pass a bill to bring such female sex offender criminal to justice?

  4. ___As a victim to a much heavier Stanford Campus Atrocity Case [Stanford police case number: IR #04-111-0335; Victim: Peter Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler], I’d invite (1) all the 1.3 million of those who had signed this ‘calling for Persky’s removal’ Petition,(2) all the 66 legislators passing California Assembly Bill AB 2888, (3) members from Gender Card Groups UltraViolet / GRLCVLT, and also those (4) more than 1,000 self-identified survivors of sexual assault and domestic violence from the women’s advocacy group UltraViolet, as well as (5) Superior Court administration, and (6) California Commission on Judicial Performance to look into the much heavier Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity case; I want to hear what they think about those bloody-stripes on me due to Scheler’s assault; I want to hear their opinion on the miscarriage of justice of this case for over 12 years at judicial system; How could it last that long?
    ___I’d tell them that Alaleht Kiancerci of Santa Clara County deputy district attorney, Santa Clara District Attorney Jeff Rosen, and Stanford Law Professor Michele Dauber, and also those 66 legislators passing California Assembly Bill AB 2888, did not do it in earnest (actually very PRETENTIOUS); they do not have the credibility as judicial officers or law professors or just as human beings, because they had deliberately ignored / covered up all the anti-humanity crimes coming out of the much heavier Gabriele Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity case___ Under such a situation, their outcry for fairness and justice in name of anyone is very PHONY; so don’t appreciate it;

    ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

    ___Gabriele Scheler’s crimes were aggravated by a pack of fascists behind her; Scheler had never regreted on such serious crimes she had committed, but count on those powerful fascists to rival rules of laws; for over 12 years, a lot more tragedies had been created based on her false accusations; Scheler and the fascism powers behind her had gone too far; Scheler needs to be brought to justice, so do those fascists on her side who had committed the much heavier retaliatory fascism crimes through these many years, including her collateral Sebastian Thrun, Stanford Villain JJJ Mr. John Arrilaga who also backed up a fascism coup in Stanford University, hidden judicial officers ZZZ/YYY/VVV from Santa Clara District Attorney’s Office led by Mr. Jeff Rosen, and also their fascism collateral Kaifu Lee who colluded with those fascists on side of Sebastian Thrun / Gabriele Scheler to retaliate on me from China, etc.
    ___Though I am not a professional law practitioner, by common sense, what Gabriele Scheler and those fascists had done would be serious enough to get them arrested and send them to jail ___ Anyone disagree?

  5. Dear Ms. Lauren Schoenthaler, a recently appointed Stanford Senior Associate Vice Provost for institutional equity and access ,

    About your interview on September 2, 2016 posted on Stanford News titled: ‘Q&A: Sexual violence prevention and response at Stanford’; it reads:
    >>”I don’t know Emily Doe, but like millions of others who read her extraordinary letter to Brock Turner, I am incredibly impressed by this young woman. She has individually and personally been able to shine a spotlight on campus rape, and she has moved the conversation from the steps of campus administration buildings to family dinner tables all around the country. … Emily Doe should not have been sexually assaulted anywhere, and she should not have been sexually assaulted at Stanford. On behalf of the Stanford community, I offer my heartfelt apology that this happened to her …”

    ___Brock Turner is more trustworthy than that girl ‘Emily Doe’, because Brock Turner speaks under his real name, while Emily Doe is just a PRETENTIOUS moniker; While someone hailed that girl as a hero and claimed to believe in her, I’d call her a COWARD and untrustworthy;

    ___Yeah, that girl should not have been sexually assaulted on any campus, but she should not have drunk way too much while playing around in a wild party, either; she should not further allow some PRETENTIOUS and COWARDICE figures like Stanford Law Professor Ms. Michele Dauber to take advantage of her case and manipulate public opinion while still remains anonymous; It did happen in an event of protest at the San Jose Courthouse organized by Ms. Dauber on the day Brock Turner was released;

    ___Santa Clara DA Mr. Jeff Rosen and Stanford Law Professor Ms. Michele Dauber’s overzealous performance in Turner’s case had raised a lot of conflicts in our society while they became PRETENTIOUS and COWARDICE when being challenged with the much heavier Gabriele Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case, which indicates that they didn’t do it for the ‘fairness and justice’ of our society; they must have hided something beyond what they had told us; So I’d tell this girl to Watch Out! when they set her up as a prop, especially as an anonymous prop;

    ___ On top of all the mess, this girl would be very much insincere and untrustworthy to still remain anonymous, if she wants to have Ms. Michele Dauber / Mr. Jeff Rosen or anyone else to use her case to manipulate public opinion, she needs to show us her real identity to withstand public scrutiny,

    ___Therefore, it’s very much unfair to blame it all on Brock Turner while apologize to this anonymous girl who’s hiding behind a PRETENTIOUS moniker ‘Emily Doe’;

    If there are any questions, please don’t hesitate to ask; my contact: caomingpeter126AT126DOTcom

    Sincerely,

    Peter Cao

  6. Dear Ms. Laurie Smith of Santa Clara Sheriff Chief,

    Are you also a feminism extremist? the likes of Stanford Law Professor Ms. Michele Dauber and of Santa Clara DA Mr. Jeff Rosen’s?

    According to a video clip in a report posted on wiat.com titled: ‘California Sheriff unhappy with Brock Turner sentence’, you said that “I am not happy with the sentence (of Brock Turner’s Case)” and that “Anybody charged with convicted of rape ought to do time of prison; and that’s why I am supporting Assembly Bill 2888; It’s on the Governor’s desk right now …”

    ___Ms. Smith, on official document, Brock Turner’s Case is a sexual assault case, but not a rape case; so you are making a fuss right in front of the media; how unprofessional!

    ___Ms. Smith, Brock Truner needs to be protected from the overblown of his case to the whole society, don’t you think so? Also, on top of all the mess, this victim girl in Brock Turner’s case would be very much insincere and untrustworthy to still remain anonymous; If she wants to have Ms. Michele Dauber / Mr. Jeff Rosen or anyone else to use her case to manipulate public opinion, she needs to show us her real identity in order to withstand public scrutiny, don’t you think so, too?

    ___Ms. Smith, Woman can sexual assault man as well; In Gabriele Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case [Stanford police case number: IR #04-111-0335; Victim: Peter Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler] (attention to the 7 photo evidence, also in ATTACHED 7), this Criminal Suspect Gabriele Scheler kicked me, and then suddenly stabbed me with a pen from behind while I was facing the robot, and then she repeatedly kicked on my groin part; when I told her: ‘You got it, very painful’, she replied: “it’s not good for fertilizer, eh?” ___Isn’t that a typical sexual assault behavior? How could such obscene behaviors be ignored by those judicial officers? What do you think about such lewd behavior? What do you think about those bloody stripes on me due to Scheler’s assault? Why not urge legislators to pass a bill to bring such female sex offender criminal to justice?

    ___Ms. Smith, there are serious retaliatory fascism crimes originated in Gabriele Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case happened right here on land of Santa Clara County of California, under your jurisdiction; But how could this criminal suspect Gabriele Scheler still at large? Why hasn’t Scheler been arrested till today? What is worse, there are some hidden judicial officers ZZZ/YYY/VVV from Santa Clara DA’s Office led by Mr. Jeff Rosen, who had actively colluded with those fascists on side of the criminal suspect Gabriele Scheler to retaliate on the victims___they are part of this fascism conspiracy and they became the real menace to our society___What do you think about such a situation?
    ___Ms. Smith, before you can concur crimes in Gabriele Scheler’s Case, and before you can arrest those fascists in Gabriele Scheler’s Case, how could you have any credibility to publicly talk about Brock Turner’s case or any other criminal case?
    ___Ms. Smith, isn’t that a basic instinct that embedded into the spirits of us all to spontaneously fight against such anti-humanity crimes?
    ___Ms. Smith, if there are any questions, please, don’t hesitate to ask; My contact: caomingpeter126AT126DOTcom

    Sincerely,

    Peter Cao

  7. ___Santa Clara District Attorney’s office led by Mr. Jeff Rosen, who’s handling Turner’s Case, had no credibility as judicial officers because they failed to clarify a much heavier Stanford Campus Atrocity Case; [Stanford police case number: IR #04-111-0335; Victim: Peter Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler] and failed to protect victims and failed to bring those fascists to justice;

    We know Turner was found guilty in a Stanford sexual assault case (I am not good at legal terms like ‘sexual assault’ or ‘rape’ or what’s the difference) and he will face the consequences; he had remorsed and the rest of his life would be influenced; but it should not be the end of his everything;

    I remember in Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case, this Criminal Suspect Gabriele Scheler kicked me, and then suddenly stabbed me with a pen from behind while I was facing the robot, and then she repeatedly kicked on my groin part; when I told her: ‘You got it, very painful’, she replied: “it’s not good for fertilizer, eh?” ___Isn’t that a typical sexual assault behavior? How could such obscene behaviors be ignored by those judicial officers?

    • Over the years I had either sent materials directly to judicial authorities or post evidence on the web to publicly challenge such crimes; but those officers handling this case dare never confront me to clarify the case, but hided in the darkness and intrude my privacy and generated all kinds of ridiculous excuses to cover up the criminal suspect like: ‘you should call police’ … and then I said I did go to police and directly filed report, and then they generated another excuse: ‘Scheler called 911 first, whoever called 911 first became complainant’ … and then I said ‘I don’t believe there is a law saying whoever calls 911 first becomes complainant; as a matter of fact, I did report to authorities well ahead of Gabriele Scheler did, so in reality I am the original complainant’; … and then no follow-ups; while I post this public challenge on the web and challenge them every day, those officers failed to take the action but actively plotted numerous conspiracies against the victim like me; till today, for over 12 years, fascism still prevails, miscarriage of justice is still going on; and then they said: ‘Statue time of limitation had expired’ (Whose the fault is it then?); How SHAMELESS an excuse like this could be! ___ What kind of judicial officers are these? Who are they actually working for? Can we count on them to guard our living safety? Can we expect them to bring those fascists to justice?

      Why bluffing Turner’s Case while completely ignoring Scheler’s case? didn’t Mr. Jeff Rosen realize that Scheler’s case had produced endless tragedies to human society in the past 12 years and counting? Turner had been trailed and remorsed and sentenced; Scheler never was; Scheler had recanted her testimony and falsely accused me for ‘sexual assault’ on no evidence while hiding her recanted testimony; and the false accusations from this criminal suspect Gabriele Scheler had been colluded by some hidden judicial officers ZZZ/YYY/VVV (from Santa Clara DA led by Mr. Jeff Rosen); and such of their conspiracy had produced even much heavier crimes;

      Mr. Jeff Rosen so far hasn’t realized his mistake; he’s still trying to cover up Scheler’s crimes with dishonest excuses; If Mr. Jeff Rosen is not honest in Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case, how could we count on him over Turner’s case? Or on any other case? Under such a situation, their outcry for heavier punishment on Mr. Turner by those officers led by Santa Clara District Attorney Jeff Rosen is very PHONY___Anyone disagree?

      I bet Mr. Jeff Rosen does it for some untold political reasons; maybe he needs support from powerful fascists on side of Gabriele Scheler / Sebastian Thrun to run for re-election or expects to run for a bigger post (California Attorney General?) later on; and that could be a factor …

  8. Dear Nelson Barrette(Winthrop’17) Editorial Chair / Ryan O’Meara’18 Editorial Chair / Mariel Klein(Lowell’17) Editor in Chief of Harvard Crimson,

    About your report titled “It’s Me, One of Your Statistics, And I Have Something to Say to You, Harvard” By ANONYMOUS on September 7, 2016; I’d suggest this ANONYMOUS lady to to speak under her real name to have some credibility if she wants to use her case gain public sympathy and to influence public opinion;

    About the much hyped Brock Turner’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case referred in this Harvard Crimson article, I have something to say to you too, Harvard:
    ___Brock Turner’s case is overblown by a pact of fascists in on side of a criminal suspect named Gabriele Scheler who had committed crimes in a much heavier Stanford Campus Atroticy Case; But Scheler was covered up by fascism powers while Brock Turner is being demonized by the same pact of fascists to serve a bigger fascism conspiracy; And that girl in Brock Turner’s case, who is hiding behind a PRETENTIOUS moniker ‘Emily Doe’, is set up as a prop by those fascists in this PHONY ‘Heavier Punishment on Brock Turner’ and ‘Recall the Judge’ Campaign which had raised a lot of conflicts to our society;

    However, a victim’s testimony should also be able to withstand public scrutiny; that girl had already lost all her credibility for remaining anonymous on top of all the mess coming out of this case; Therefore, I’d tell this Harvard lady to think it over when she hypes her case to the public ANONYMOUSLY;

  9. Please see the attached public challenge against fascism crimes that got Brock Turner’s case involved; While you might consider Brock Turner’s case an educational material for college students, I’d appreciate if Harvard Crimson would write down an article about the much heavier Gabriele Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case [Stanford police case number: IR #04-111-0335; Victim: Peter Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler], which have much more real substance for anyone at all to be educated; Harvard society deserves to know, the whole world of humanity deserves to know;

    Also, I have posted some comments in this New York Magazine article titled: “Anonymous Student Pens Op-ed About How Harvard Mishandled Her Rape”; you are welcomed to go there for further discussion;

    ___Isn’t is a basic instinct that embedded into the spirits of us all to spontaneously fight against such anti-humanity crimes?

    ___If there are any questions, please don’t hesitate to ask;

    Sincerely,

  10. ___What’s the fuss!

    ___The whole setting of this heavier punishment on Brock Turner and this ‘Recall Judge Persky Campaign’ is very PHONY; it is led by Santa Clara District Attorney Jeff Rosen and Stanford Law Professor Michele Dauber both of whom are puppets up in the front, and backed up by the fascism powers behind the scene on side of a criminal suspect Gabriele Scheler in a much heavier Stanford Campus Atrocity Case [Stanford police case number: IR #04-111-0335; Victim: Peter Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler] Such a point is evidenced by the fact that both of the above puppet figures became PRETENTIOUS and COWARDICE to, and SHAMELESSLY ignoring, the much heavier Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case while radically bluffing Turner’s Case, therefore, neither Mr. Rosen nor Ms Dauber has the credibility to be a judicial officer or a law professor in this PRETENTIOUS campaign;

    ___Both Mr. Jeff Rosen and Ms. Michele Dauber poised to play as a hero in this farce, even though things did not go well as planned, as they had lost big in their plot on the heavier punishment on Brock Turner; but they along with fascism powers behind them on side of this Criminal Suspect Gabriele Scheler had gambled all their credibility on this PRETENTIOUS campaign that they cannot afford to lose; so they came back to make a scene with a new bill and this ‘Recalling the Judge’ Campaign in order to save the face of those fascists’ behind them as well as of themselves;

    ___But, both Mr. Jeff Rosen and Ms. Michele Dauber are actually posers who cannot explain themselves in light of such a public challenge directly addressed to them; Now they call in support from more posers, like Senator Jerry Hill (D-San Mateo), Assemblymen Evan Low (D-Campbell) and Bill Dodd (D-Napa), Stanford Law Professors Mark Lemley / Frederick I. Richman, Stanford Comparative Literature Professor David Palumbo-Liu; and here are the two gender cards: UltraViolet Group / GRL CVLT , etc.

    ___However, like other posers whom those fascists had produced in the past, all of the above people had become or would become PRETENTIOUS and COWARDICE as well when being challenged on their stance on such anti-humanity crimes coming along with the much heavier Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case, which means they did not do it in earnest, not ‘for Fairness and for Justice’ of our society; and accordingly ,they all had lost their credibility as human beings since the start of this PHONY Campaign, independent of their status as legislators or judicial officers or University Professors;

    ___Mr. Jeff Rosen and Ms. Michele Dauber, would you have the honesty to tell us: who are you actually working for?

  11. >>Some COWARD argued for those Corrupted Officers led by Mr. Jeff Rosen “Do you want an honest answer as to why they (Santa Clara DA Officers) are ignoring your case? Statute of limitations for sexual assault in California is 6 years, rape is 10. It has been 12 years.”

    ___You are not honest at all; ‘they’ (those judicial officers handling this case?) are ingoring Scheler’s case because:
    (1) ‘they’ are afraid of the fascism powers behind Gabriele Scheler;
    (2) ‘they’ had played a role in Gabriele Scheler’s false accusations and in their retaliatory fascism crimes from fascists on Scheler’s side; If Scheler’s case clarified, ‘they’ would have to be brought to justice, too; so ignoring Scheler’s case means ignoring their own culpability;
    ___and that is the honest answer, right?

Leave A Reply