0 471
Christina Metzqer
Staff Writer

Unconditional Positive Regard is a method of relating that builds up self-worth and positive regard for the self and others.

Students on campus are finding UPR beneficial, both personally and professionally.

UPR is kindness in action. It’s characterized by giving feedback with a positive comment first, addressing the action that requires improvement and finishing with another positive comment.

“I’ve had it used on me before. It has helped to build strong character,” Desmond Hooks, staff member at the SUB Games Center, said. “I do believe it works when it is used correctly.”

Students are regularly presented with situations personally and professionally that require dealing with others’ negative behavior. Not having the ability to maneuver through these occurrences in a healthy way leads to discontentment, resentment or other negative feelings towards others.

Negativity was not always a bad thing though. There was a point during human evolution where humans would use the negative in order to protect themselves from harm or danger. Now it is not so simple.

Mary Pritchard, a psychology professor at Boise State, explained that the negativity people experience now is much more harmful than what humans encountered during evolution.

“If something bad is happening now, usually it is caused by something that is not going to kill you—it is social comparison, judgment, discrimination or even stereotyping,” Pritchard said. “It is something that is not threatening but still very emotionally scarring.”

In order to maintain healthy relationships at work and school, students should learn and implement UPR in their everyday lives.

As described on the website, “Simply Psychology,” UPR was introduced by Dr. Carl Rogers in 1956. Rogers explained that UPR is a valuable tool to restore self-worth and positive regard in others.

If the UPR user does not embrace the idea behind the theory, UPR will not work. For students and parents, less criticism is paramount. It is especially helpful for students who struggle with challenging interactions involving difficult classmates, professors or even roommates with whom they cohabitate.

The opposite of UPR is Conditional Positive Regard. It is the idea that people are valued only if they can live up to the expectations or conditions set by others. It is necessary to keep in mind that kindness is more important than blaming or shaming.

Other students on campus are using UPR to reduce harmful criticism while working with others in a professional way.

“If I was looking at someone else’s program or coding, maybe I would criticize it but then also offer positive feedback as well,” said Brendon Tierney, computer science major.

According to Dr. Stephen Joseph, professor of psychology, health and social care at the University of Nottingham, UK and writer for “Psychology Today,” UPR is about respecting others enough to allow them to act regardless of danger or dysfunction, and accept that they are doing their best.

“From there you can come from a place of understanding and compassion rather than blame and criticism,” Pritchard said. “The more you do that, the better you feel about yourself, the better you feel about your life and the easier it is to be a more positive person towards others.”

The better we can relate to others, the better off we will all be. Instead of propagating negativity, students should think about how they respond to other’s behavior and work to improve their own.

0 435
Eric Naylor
Spring 2014 History graduate 

I want to echo my agreement with Leslie Boston-Hyde in her defense of free speech.

However, there was one thing which she said which gave me pause. It was when she said, “Is it right to tell a woman that she is a baby murderer and display large, gruesome posters of aborted fetuses while she is walking to class or an exam?”

As a member of the Pro-Life group which hosted this event, I feel the need to clarify that that was not our message. We were not accusing post-abortive women of murder. Our goal was to show that the pre-born are human, and that abortion kills them. We felt (and still feel) that if more people knew that then there would be fewer abortions.

Unfortunately, she was not the only one who missed what we were trying to say. If she were, I would probably just let it go.

If people wanted to object to our methods, that would be fine. Looking back, I do not even know that I would disagree. But I would rather not have anyone say that we were accusing women of murder when that was not in any way our message.

Now I did not disagree with Boston-Hyde’s overall point; on the contrary, I loved her closing sentence that “the minute we start to regulate offensive arguments is the minute we give up our right to free speech.” But there’s a point to what I’m saying here, beyond deflecting accusations of being judgmental. The point is that, before you analyze or respond to an opinion, it would be a good idea to make sure that you understand what is being said.

In our example, I think a lot of people assumed that we were accusing post-abortive women of murder because we showed pictures of aborted fetuses, and there have been more mean-spirited protesters in the past who have made those accusations while showing similar images.

Another example was when Charles Darwin put forth his theory of natural selection, and people thought he was trying to undermine religious faith when, in reality, he was merely presenting a working model (natural selection) for a theory which already existed (evolution). Attacking, defending or even addressing the existence of God was not even on his mind, but there were many who took it that way nonetheless.

The result: endless flame wars that have continued down to this day.

I agree with most of what has been said by Boston-Hyde and others: free speech should be defended. I also believe that the right to respond to opinions you do not like should be protected. But before doing so, it is always a good idea to know exactly what message you are responding to.

0 1031
Jesse Baggenstos
Material Science & Engineering Graduate

This letter to the editor was received in response to the Feb. 17 feature story “Gender lies outside social norms.”

If the recent “Add the Words” debate has taught us anything, it is that gender identity and sexual orientation remain hotly contested issues, with numerous adherents on each side. At the heart of both issues is a fundamental disagreement about the nature of gender and attraction. In this light, Tuesday’s myopic feature regarding gender is blatantly irresponsible.

The article can hardly be considered an opinion piece, much less an investigative effort, as the author makes no attempt to discuss both sides of the issue, completely ignoring the traditional male/female understanding of gender.

Instead, the author is content to parrot the opinions of the various quoted individuals, all of which are of the same mind, and neglects to insert even a sentence of critique. In doing so, the author has erased the voices of Boise State students and alumni who argued in favor of traditional gender and sexual mores in the recent hearings just blocks away at the state capital.

Has The Arbiter already forgotten? Fair-minded individuals have flocked to both sides of the issue, and gender is currently a fiercely debated topic at BSU;  the four graphics that accompany this article fail to acknowledge this debate.  Rather, they read like an informational flyer, the contents of which are as settled and final as the orbits of the planets.

The Arbiter is certainly free to express its own editorial opinions, whatever they may be, but to present them as fact without critical analysis or even mention of possible dissent drags Boise State’s flagship paper in the direction of a political pamphlet rather than a journalistic establishment.

0 488
Emily Pehrson

The Arbiter recently published our “Love & Relationships” issue in honor of Valentine’s Day. However, among the many questions that arise when speaking about relationships we stumbled on one we didn’t expect.

For a piece in our recent “Love & Relationships” issue, one of our journalists interviewed a student about what their ideal Valentine’s Day would be, how much it was acceptable to spend, what their habits were, etc.—seemingly harmless questions. However, after being interviewed, this student called the office and asked that their quotes be removed from the article because they were embarrassed about their current single status and didn’t want it advertised to the university.

While the staff of The Arbiter was more than happy to comply with the student’s request, it did bring us to a relationship question we hadn’t considered before: Why is there such a stigma against being single?

At this point in our society, it’s kind of ridiculous. Living alone encapsulates many of the values we tout in contemporary society: self-realization, independence and individualism.

We live in a day and age where more people are living alone than ever before. According to the 2010 census, more than 40 percent of households contain at least one single adult. In premiere American cities such as Manhattan and Washington D.C. nearly half of all households are occupied by a single person.

Yet we live in fear of being labeled old maids. The term “bachelor pad” summons visions of sad, drab, lifeless abodes. We have created imaginary dimensions like the “friendzone” and jokingly renamed a holiday “Singles Awareness Day.”

So why all the heartache? Helen Croydon, author of “Screw the Fairytale: A Modern Girl’s Guide to Sex and Love,” explains that what started as a bonding for protection and practical means has failed to keep up with contemporary society.

“The language we use implies that (getting married) is the right thing to do. I think it’s really sad in a way, when there are so many ways of finding success … Young people don’t see through the conspiracy,” Croydon said in an July 2014 interview with The Guardian.

While there’s nothing wrong with coupling up and  finding love—if you’re into that—we should be equally accepting of those who remain forever single at heart. We should accept their choice to follow the words of Louisa May Alcott: “Liberty is a better husband than love to many of us.”

Confessions of a married female Boise State student
Alx Stickel
News Editor

As a married woman, sometimes I’m excited by the idea of living the single college student life.

One of the pros of being single: you’re your own person.

When you’re married, you and your partner are usually thought to be inseparable, and you often are. You adopt each others habits and start embodying similar personality traits.

Often, when I go out by myself, I’m greeted with, “Where’s your husband?”

My response: “Hi, I’m happy to see you too.”

Valentine’s Day also perpetuates a social (or parental) pressure to find a significant other.

My response: tell society and/or the parents to get over themselves.

Honestly, committed life is not all it’s hyped up to be. There’s a lot of coordinating schedules, arguing over what to have for dinner and compromising on the night out.

My point here is: committed relationships take a lot of work. Isn’t getting through college hard enough?

I understand there is this romantic notion of not being single. Being in a relationship usually means someone is there to emotionally support you, or at the very least, take you out for Chinese food once in awhile.

My response: don’t your friends do that? If they don’t, I advise getting different friends.

Around Valentine’s Day, complaints of “it sucks to be single” hover in the air.

My response: Quit complaining.

The phrase “You don’t know what you have till it’s gone” comes to mind.

You won’t appreciate the freedoms of being single till you don’t have them anymore.


0 755

By Patty Bowen, Justin Kirkham and August McKernan

Images of people holding hands, kissing and sugar-sweet talking stalk students every Valentine’s day.

Relationships are huge, but they really shouldn’t be.  Some students base their entire world around romance, while others wallow in loneliness.

“People talk way more about loving other people than they talk about loving themselves,” said Delaney Smith, freshman marketing major. “But I feel like you need to love yourself in order to love someone else. You can’t really understand what love is until you love yourself.”

Acknowledgment of a broader and more diverse spectrum of love could play an important role in developing  healthy self-image and self-worth, fully replacing the need for fickle, outside validation.

“(Self-love is important because) it makes life worth living,” said Ranae Fannin, freshman exercise science major. “If you don’t love yourself, what do you love?”

Taking time to mold and craft yourself is vital before developing any further relationships.

“Sometimes I just like to go and get my hair cut or get my nails just to feel pretty for a day,” Fannin said.

According to Mary Pritchard, psychology professor, self-worth is the “foundation of a healthy relationship.” A good mental image supports the mental and physical health of students by helping safeguard them against depression.

These positive emotions boost the immune system and help to deter mental health complications associated with depression.

“I think negative self-esteem is a real problem, especially for college women,” Smith said. “It makes me sad because I feel that everyone should find themselves beautiful.”

Negative self-images are rampant and every student should be aware of the toll their personal visualizations have on their mental well-being.  Regardless of identity, all students can find small ways to appreciate themselves instead of vying for outside approval.

Smith currently belongs to the sorority Tri-Delta who founded a program called Body Image 3-D, which focuses on promoting a positive body image.

“At the beginning of the fall semester, after our sorority started, we had a thing called Fat Talk Free Week,” Smith said. “We all changed our profile pictures to something we love about ourselves.”

Smith found that focusing on positive aspects of oneself and complimenting others on their strengths can help to create a healthy environment for self-love.

This sort of action, combined with Fannin’s “treating yourself” philosophy, is incredibly useful nurturing a stronger self-image and bettering one’s self love.  It can be  extravagant like buying yourself several new outfits from H&M or a social media #blessed post. It can be small like a personal reminders of worth but it is quintessential to remember to practice self-love whether you’re buying flowers for yourself or someone else this Valentine’s Day.

“(For Valentine’s Day) I’ll probably buy myself chocolate because I love chocolate and splurge a little,” Fannin said. “Maybe go get my nails done for once.”

0 819

Despite lingering ideas of Justin Timberlake and Jessica Alba, Netflix is the true heartthrob of our generation. And, unlike celebrities who might slap you with a restraining order in return for your undying affection, Netflix has enough depth and substance to create a place for everyone.

For those of you who haven’t been entranced by the beautiful red glow of her header on your screen: it’s not her, it’s you. However it’s not too late for the love forlorn to turn to this leading lady and enjoy the benefits of her support.

I can honestly say Netflix is the healthiest relationship I’ve ever had. Further, it’s the best relationship the average college student can invest in.

As with all relationships, some things are more effective than others.

1. Don’t play with her

Netflix is happy to give you what you want but only if she knows. Having multiple people watching regularly under the same account plays with her emotions. How can she truly know you if you’re passing her around?

Don’t worry about your best friend Jessica who is sharing your account: Netflix thought of her, too. She can have her own page and queue. Your freeloading buddy is welcome to share in the love without derailing your rapport, as long as she does it on her own page.

2. Communicate with her

Netflix is a lady. If you tell her the truth, she’ll respect you for it. Don’t be afraid to tell her “Trailer Park Boys” was one of the worst shows you’ve ever had the misfortune of watching. And give her a nod when the obscure British comedy she recommended tickles your
socks off.

After two years of diligent, truthful rating Netflix will know what you like better than the people around you. Her stamp of approval will be gold.

And, when Jessica recommends some terrible show about online gaming addicts and promises you’ll love it, take Netflix’s advice: if she says it two stars, it’s two stars. You’ll save yourself a couple hours and, in the end, Netflix will get her moment anyway when, in shame, you mark “The Guild” with only two stars.

3. Be open to new things, change

I constantly hear people complain that the selection on Netflix is poor which is something I can hardly understand. My queue is always so full I never have time to watch it all, even if I continually delay my homework later and later into the night. The key to this is twofold: 1) you have to communicate (as I’ve mentioned before). 2) You can’t only watch the shows you saw network commercials for.

This is college. Live dangerously. Try something new.

And finally, be accepting when she changes. This is the hardest part of any relationship. Netflix will change and, yes, sometimes it will hurt.

When “Dr. Who” is taken out of the lineup and you’re not able to repeatedly torture yourself with the loss of Rose Tyler, you will experience a new sort of pain. But stick with her. Netflix will come back around and, eventually, she’ll reward you with new episodes of “House of Cards.”

0 926

History repeats itself, but it’s whether or not we learn from the mistakes and improve upon them that makes a difference.

We’re oppressing basic human rights for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community. Idaho must stop this discrimination and pass a law to protect these citizens.

Here we are in another civil rights movement, where the question of people’s humanity comes in. We’re hearing the same unjustified arguments that “invalidated” women’s and African-American’s rights.

“This is about human dignity and respect. Every human being deserves equal access and equal protection of law—period,” Rep. Melissa Wintrow told The Arbiter after the decision to reject Add the Words on
Jan. 29.

In December 2014, Dan Jones & Associates polled 520 Idaho adults, asking whether or not it should be illegal to discriminate someone based on sexual orientation. Approximately two-thirds of the respondents believed that this type of discrimination should be illegal.

While the sample size is small, representatives clearly aren’t listening to the majority of voices in Idaho.

It’s been endowed upon elective representatives to embody the Constitution and freedoms that America offers. Excluding the LGBT community from these rights reflects poorly on the government officials who vote against human rights bills, such as House Bill 2.

One of the main arguments against Add the Words is that homosexuality is a choice.

Scientists are proving this claim wrong. In 2008, researchers at the Karolinska Institute found structural differences between homosexual and heterosexual male brains. Homosexual men’s brains structurally resemble a heterosexual woman’s brain much more closely than that of a heterosexual man.

The other main argument against Add the Words is that religious organizations would have to perform marriages of homosexuals or transgender couples. The most recent House Bill 2 allowed exemptions for these organizations to respect their right to religious freedoms, as outlined by the first amendment.

“There are good people, Christian people, who are using, intentionally or unintentionally, their religion as a shield to justify certain behaviors,” Wintrow said.

Having been raised Christian, I was taught the core teaching of Christianity is love for one another. Denying other people rights to equality doesn’t show neighborly love. While some argue over specific Bible verses and theologies, it is clear that being able to empathize, respect and ultimately love is an overarching theme within the religion.

A complication that arises from adding “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” to the current Idaho Civil Rights Act is that the two phrases were not clearly defined. This could allow other groups, such as child molestors, to argue that they would be protected under “sexual orientation.” It’s a small factor, but if adjusted, the bill could have a stronger chance.

However, in today’s society, it is common knowledge that “sexual orientation” refers to relationships between two consenting adults.

The fact that we are arguing over who deserves basic human rights is appalling. Add the Words isn’t over, and hopefully, next year, this story will have a new ending.

0 496
Courtesy Angel Hernandez
ASBSU Secretary of External Affairs

The article by August McKernan, published January 29, 2015, dealing with the rise of textbook prices was spot on. The truth is that the continuous rise of textbook prices has become one of the greatest challenges to obtaining a higher education both nationally and statewide.

Not only are students beaten by the overwhelming shadows of debt that are accumulated due to the rising costs of tuition, but we are also being priced out of an education due to the exorbitant cost associated with books. Equally frustrating is the fact that sometimes the expensive books that we have to buy are not even used by some professors.

Although, at times the textbooks are hardly touched by some professors, there are those professors that do rely on them heavily making it a risk to forgo textbooks to save money. Not having a textbook for a class can present some serious academic problems for most of us.

Their importance as a tool for studying and learning is undeniable but yet, little has been done to ensure that textbooks are attainable for all students. The realities associated with the rise of textbook prices presents a serious challenge that requires the attention of our administration, faculty and students. This is not a Boise State problem it’s a national problem!

Although no solution is a silver bullet, I am certain that we can do better and that we must do better ensure that a textbook does not determine whether or not someone can afford a college education.

It is my belief that we need to provide alternatives to students that do not wish to purchase the overpriced books at the bookstore. I am a proponent of a student run exchange that will allow for a much more organized way of students to sell and or trade books with one another.

There should also be a greater reliance on e-books over traditional textbooks and professors should be sure to decide which textbooks they will be requiring for a class well ahead of time so that students have the necessary time to search for more affordable options. It would also be helpful if our bookstore had a greater supply of used books to save a little extra money.

The need for a college degree is more important than ever in order to be able to find a good-paying job. Therefore, it is incumbent on all of us to make education as accessible and as affordable as possible.

Taking on the challenge of pricy textbooks is a great start to ensuring that every Boise State student has the degree necessary to pursue all passions and aspirations.

0 785

Last year, the Quad was the center of attention at Boise State, with angry anti-abortionists and overly passionate preachers expressing their opinions freely.

There are those who know how to use the power of free speech perfectly. They employ motivating speeches without attacking people.

On the flip side, people condemn others for being different or disagreeing with their views.

While Boise State is discussing the Quad policy, it’s difficult to take a step back and realize what’s really at stake.

Our right to express our thoughts is a powerful tool, and we should use it. When given such power, it’s important to remember not to abuse it.

It’s easy to say, “Ban the controversial speakers. They disrupt the learning environment.” By controlling what is said in the Quad, however, Boise State would infringe upon the First Amendment right to free speech.

Without the freedom of speech, America would no longer be a republic. The government relies on its citizens to speak openly and without fear of the government reprimanding them. If free speech was eradicated, we would be stuck in the world of George Orwell’s “1984,” and that’s scary.

Is it right to tell a woman that she is a baby murderer and display large, gruesome posters of aborted fetuses while she is walking to class or an exam? Is it fair to a homosexual to say he is going to hell for loving someone of the same sex?

Believe me, I was deeply offended by comments made by the protestors. I was told that I should not be in college because of my gender, and that, instead, I should be at home taking care of a man and his children. This was a Christian preacher talking down to a fellow Christian. It was very appalling, to say the least, and goes against the core values of the religion.

I would love it if I had never heard those comments on my way to take a test. I’m sure plenty of students felt the same way.

It’s the price of free speech.

People speaking need to realize that not everyone shares similar views.  For those of us who might not necessarily enjoy being scrutinized for various reasons, we’ll just have to buck up and endure.

The minute we start to regulate offensive arguments is the minute we give up our right to free speech.

Student Voices 

Question: Should free speech be regulated on campus? Why/why not?

Caitlin Hayden

Caitlin Hayden, junior marketing major

“I’ve had a similar experience (to Canestro’s) where you’re walking through the Quad or you kind of get attacked—it feels like—by certain groups that almost take it upon themselves to rather than sharing their message to educate others about what they believe, they really take it a step too far; they start attacking individuals that maybe don’t align specifically with their ideals and beliefs. I think we need to appreciate the opportunity that we have with free speech, take advantage of it, speak about what we do believe in and what what’s important to us, we can’t just ignore the fact that we have that right in this country, we really should appreciate that we have that.”

Alyssa Canestro

Alyssa Canestro, senior health science major

“I appreciate free speech, I think it’s something beautiful we as a country share however I do think people take it a step too far, especially when we have people who are angry  about religion and yelling at students, it makes me feel uncomfortable when we’re here to get an education, we’re here to make up our own ideas about the world I personally don’t feel comfortable walking by and I’m wearing my sorority letters and someone is calling me a whore. That’s when I don’t feel like going to school. It’s not something I want to hear when I’m on campus.”

Lane Mentaberry

Lane Mentaberry, freshman business major

“No, I don’t think it should be regulated. Everyone is an adult and everyone has freedom of speech so you can say what you want to say where you want to say it, it doesn’t need to be regulated by the school at all.”

Connor Demond

Connor Demond, freshman business major

“I don’t think it should be. We’re all adults. Of course, if it’s going to be offensive you’re going to get in trouble for it just like you would in the regular world and it’s already regulated to a certain extent.”

0 496

This letter to the editor was written in response to the article titled “Policy for speech in the Boise State Quad remains undecided” published in the Jan. 11 issue of The Arbiter.

Wuthrich is right. Free speech needs to be protected.

Like many students last semester, I was discouraged to see and hear the offensive and deconstructive speech that was spoken by some speakers in the Quad. I was also discouraged by hearing students, instead of speaking respectfully, resorting to the same base tactics of name calling and harassment that the speakers showed. But, while some events and exchanges might have been unpleasant, I find that that reaction by some students to try to regulate free speech the most disappointing.

The whole purpose in a university can be found in its name—a combination of “unity” and “diversity.” Everyone united under one name yet each sharing differing viewpoints on the world. To start to regulate and ban free speech teaches students a very dangerous lesson, that they have the right not to be offended.

Nowhere in any of our laws is there a right to be unoffended. No matter what life path we might take, we are always going to offend or run into someone who might offend us, whether it be what we say or the lifestyle we live.

Instead of having a knee-jerk reaction to controversial issues, it benefits students as a whole to be exposed to these differing viewpoints. As the old saying goes, “Keep your friends close, and your enemies even closer.” It benefits students to know how the opposing side to their viewpoint thinks. It trains them how to react and debate these issues in life and in the workforce.

Just simply shutting down alternate viewpoints just because they might be “offensive” does nothing to train their minds to deal with and solve problems in life. I applaud Dean Wutrich in his defense of free speech and hope that in the future, Boise State will encourage even more free exchange of ideas and make the university the marketplace of ideas it’s meant to be.

0 642

Inversion, cold weather, and long visits with extended family can make winter a rough season for students to function in. What started out as a College Humor video has began to catch on as a trend called Winter Cling.

According to the originating video, an ideal Winter Cling is someone who is heavier set, and has a lot of warm blankets in their apartment, making it easier to huddle for warm and not feel bad about the holiday weight that is inevitable for some people. It is also optional for them to have a HBO go password and an apartment closer to your place of work.

“(Winter Cling is preferable) for some students because they go through the winter doldrums and just want someone to cuddle up to,” said Derek Bohm, sophomore kinesiology major.

For Bohm who is an outdoor person, winter presents a challenge because the cold keeps him from doing the activities he loves. Instead he often finds himself trapped indoors. This vacuum of time and happiness; however, could be best used with a winter cling.

“Some research has shown that even if we’re high on the personality trait of neuroticism by being in a loving romantic relationship it can be very beneficial to us and can reduce levels of neuroticism,” said Kimberly Hardy, assistant professor of psychology. “I’d say that people dealing with seasonal affective disorder might be able to gain from having that social support and loving relationship to a greater extent than they would during the summer.”

According to Hardy, the body releases a chemical called oxytocin, a social bonding hormone, while cuddling which makes us feel “really happy, really relaxed, and really good.” Because of this, hormonally a Winter Cling could create an easier alternative than hibernating solo for students to get through the long cold months of winter.

“Just looking outside today with the fog it makes me I want to be at home in bed, I don’t want to do anything, there isn’t that motivation to go out for a hike,” Hardy said. “When we’re more active we’re going to feel happier, we’re going to feel healthier but if we’re kind of just sitting at home alone that can make us feel more depressed.”

While the winter cling creates a great alternative to paying for your own HBO Go account and buying a cooking-for-one recipe book, it can also get you off scott-free with pesky parents who have an increasing obsession with your ability to create offspring.

“I’m sure that a lot of people go through that were they’re not seeing anybody and their parents are like ‘When are you going to bring someone home?’” Hardy said. “‘When are you going to start having

Unfortunately, according to Hardy, a year long committed relationship is the most beneficial relationship hormonally, and is usually found to be more satisfying to the demands of the vulture like family that hangs out at your Thanksgiving and Christmas dinner celebrations.

0 2327

Harry Penate is a member of the Phi Delta Theta fraternity on campus. He is a junior English: Creative Writing major.

As spring semester gets underway, the new Phi Delta Theta fraternity enters its first full semester at Boise State. The fraternity, formed in early October, has been attracting new members with its low fraternity fees, campus involvement events and diverse group of members.

The fraternity president, J.R. Rasmussen, already has his policy planned out for this semester: “as many socials and student organization events as possible.”

Last semester the fraternity was able to have a group trip to Lucky Peak, go skittles bowling for Halloween, and build gingerbread houses with the sororities on campus.

Phi Delt is also a very diverse group of students who have all different kinds of interests and hobbies. Freshman Michael Duke raps at places such as The Crux, Revolution House and Powerhouse. Junior Colton Ankeney is an avid skydiver. Junior Harry Penate performs stand-up comedy downtown at Liquid Laughs. Sophomore Colby Hall is a member of the Army ROTC program and the Idaho Army National Guard, as well as plays on the BSU club rugby team.

Phi Delt has members from all over, from New Jersey, California, Oregon, Washington, even Vietnam. Freshman Tu Huynh came to BSU from Vietnam and was one of the original founding fathers. When asked about what joining the fraternity meant, he told me “I was a little shy at first, once I moved to Boise State, but after joining Phi Delt it boosted my confidence like no other! I’m being myself around everyone, which helps me meet new people.”

If becoming the best version of yourself meeting many new friends, and getting involved on campus sounds like something you want to do, look for the Phi Delta Theta members at social events or look for the best-dressed men on campus on Sunday evenings.

4 1127

Vaccines have transformed the world of medicine. They protect society from infectious diseases that would otherwise kill millions.

Despite the many benefits that they bring, there’s still strong opposition from the general public. People ignore pushes for vaccinations against preventable diseases such as influenza, chicken pox and whooping cough.

Getting vaccinated is a crucial citizen responsibility.

Role of vaccines

“Vaccines are one of the most important medical advances of the century,” said Juliette Tinker, biology professor at Boise State and current vaccine researcher.

It’s no different than wearing a seatbelt in a car. It’s a precaution.

Not everyone who doesn’t wear a seatbelt will get in a car accident. If something were to go wrong, however, the risk is much higher if the precaution is not taken.

The same applies to vaccines. Not everyone who doesn’t get vaccinated will become sick, however, if they do, there’s a chance of fatality.

Children are suffering from the consequences of not getting vaccinated because parents are ignoring the facts. In 2012, a large whooping cough outbreak occurred in the U.S. The Center for Disease Control reported at least 48,277 cases of whooping cough, the most since 1995.

The CDC linked the outbreak to the lack of vaccinations against the disease.

Hindering myths

Many times, people refuse to get vaccinated due to their lack of education of how they work, their role and importance. Lots of myths have been built around the issue.

Dr. Andrew Wakefield published a study in “The Lancet” in 1998 stating that there was a link to an increase in autism and the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine. The study cut corners, jumped to conclusions, used a biased sample group and had questionable financial ties to the trial lawyers.

Since then, there have been over 100 studies disproving the claim that autism is linked to the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, and there’s still ongoing research looking into the issue. Ten out of the 13 original researchers have withdrawn their names from Wakefield’s study. Despite the proof, people still beat the dead horse and use it as an excuse to avoid vaccinations.

Another common myth is that vaccines will cause someone to get sick with the illness. This claim couldn’t be more wrong.

Why vaccines work

Many vaccines carry either the dead pathogen or antigenic fragments that elicit an immune response within the body. Dead pathogens cannot replicate—they are already dead. Antigenic fragments can’t either because they are only a portion of the pathogen. They can’t replicate and cause illness because they don’t have all the necessary components to replicate within the body.

Attenuated or live vaccines do have a live microbe, however it is weakened. Only a small number of the weakened pathogen is injected, just enough to cause an immune response but not nearly enough to cause illness.

Even though the virus (or bacteria) is injected into the person, it is done in a way that won’t get the person sick.

Scientists and researchers spend years developing a vaccine. On average, it takes 10 to 15 years to receive a licensure for a human vaccine to be used in public health. This includes an exploratory stage, preclinical trials with mice, clinical trials with humans, regulatory review and approval, manufacturing and quality control. Even after the vaccine receives approval, it undergoes continuous research to ensure its effectiveness.

“I think it’s really important to understand how long of a process it is to make a vaccine, and how there are really a lot of safety nets in place,” Tinker said.

Getting vaccinated is crucial for a healthy society. Not only are those who get vaccinated protecting themselves, they protect others from getting infected. This is vital for those who might be immunocompromised from an autoimmune disease or receiving chemotherapy. The less people who are carriers of the illness, the better. It protects those who can’t get vaccinated.

Take one for the team and get vaccinated. A small prick from a needle to protect lives is well worth it.

0 712
Arbiter Graphic

How do you feel about that person who always seems to be talking and asking questions in the classroom?

“It depends on the context, if it’s related to the class and not distracting it’s fine because they’re either saying things that I hadn’t thought about or they’re giving information that I actually need. A lot of times they’re just trying to debate with the teacher or whatever so it can be distracting.” – Jacob Buckley, computer science sophomore

“I like them and dislike them. Sometimes they really can start discussions and get the ball rolling and I guess sometimes they can really stop the ball just by talking about something that really has nothing to do with the topic and going off on a tangent.” – Tim Baxter, international business senior

“It can be distracting for the class when one person who’s always rambling on and you’re trying to be productive and get stuff done and you already know this person is going to start talking. It’s not something that you can’t work around but it can get annoying sometimes.” – Daniel Barth, marketing freshman

0 2419

If Idaho received a report card, it would be failing in education.

As its students and teachers struggle, the state turns a blind eye.

Idaho needs to fund education, especially teachers, in a smart, effective way.

While Idaho is finally looking to fund education, the strategy is questionable.

In 2015 the State Board of Education will be proposing the Career Ladder to the Legislature for consideration. The Board want to put nearly $200 million towards helping raise teacher pay. By increasing the base pay for teachers, Idaho hopes to draw in and keep high-quality educators within the state’s school districts.

In theory, it sounds great. Teachers are meant to instruct students and assist them in success.

In reality, it’s a horrible train wreck. The ladder doesn’t seem very easy to climb, as it’s based on years of experience, level of education and student performance. These three qualities are not an accurate measurement of teachers’ abilities and prowess.

Measuring an educator’s success based on student success is like an employee’s success being measured on the rate of customers. While great customer service can influence the rate, it’s a highly uncontrollable factor.

The same applies to teachers. A great educator can inspire some struggling students to succeed. However, teachers don’t handpick who will be in their class. It’s based on the pool of students available in the area and assigned by the school.

By random luck, a teacher may have a class full of outstanding students who always do their homework and ace exams.

Unfortunately, there will always be students who don’t care about their education, and some teacher will have to deal with these students. No matter what techniques they try, no matter how much care and effort they put into this student, it won’t matter. Some students just don’t care.

This doesn’t leave very many options for a teacher whose pay relays on the success of his or her students. Will teachers start passing students who haven’t earned their grade just for a better paycheck? It’s a strong possibility.

It’s time to get educated about education. Being 48 out of 50 is nothing to be proud of.

Although education was a focus in the recent Idaho election, between Gov. Butch Otter and self-proclaimed “Chief of Schools” Sherri Ybarra, the future is scary.

We need to treat our teachers with the respect and pay they deserve. They are the direct connection to success for our students. While the Career Ladder would be a step in that direction, its implementation will cause more harm
than good.

0 619

There’s one in every class it seems: the student who talks as much as the teacher, who raises their hand with every question or blurts out answers which turn into life stories.

In some cases this person knows what they’re talking about. In other instances, they don’t. Other students cringe at the sound of their voice as it travels through the classroom.

If you don’t know who I’m referring to, you’re probably that student.

These students should stop talking so much and allow others participate in classroom discussion.

For Ryan Cannon, assistant professor in the Communication Department, these students aren’t as much of a distraction for him as he feels they may be for other students within the classroom.

“I remember as an undergrad, you’d go to class and there would be a particular student or students perhaps … who have a lot to say or people who sometimes monopolize conversations,” Cannon said. “I think that’s where the danger comes into it. You want everyone to become involved, (but) sometimes you don’t necessarily want classroom participation to become lopsided to those one or few who are often outspoken or have a lot to say.”

This isn’t to say that everyone who raises their hand is disruptive to the students around them. However, there is a fine line between asking questions to improve your understanding and having a conversation with the professor while they’re trying to instruct a class.

“There’s a certain flow in a classroom environment,” said Kacy Bonds, sophomore secondary education major. “I think that if students keep asking questions and keep interrupting what the professors are saying it can definitely be frustrating because you’re just trying to go with the flow of the class.”

Bonds feels that those students who typically ask a lot of questions can tend to stray away from the topic the class is discussing. This can often lead to frustration among students in the class.

“I was in an introduction to education class last year and there was a woman in that class that always had to give her two cents on everything,” Bonds said. “That was incredibly frustrating because they weren’t keeping (on) course with what we were talking about in class. It was like tidbits about her own life.”

According to Leslie Clampitt, senior computer science major, this should be a sixth-sense for students at this point in their education career.

However, this may not always be the case.

“Most students who are like that don’t know how to look for social cues I guess; body language, facial expressions, that (say) they are doing something wrong and need to stop,” Clampitt said. “If they’re not at this point able to recognize those things, then they’re not going to learn it. I mean they’re adults, they should know that.”

The solution seems clear: if you think you’re talking too much and being a disruption to the classroom environment, you probably are.


Student Voices: How do you feel about that person who always seems to be talking and asking questions in the classroom?

Jacob Buckley

Jacob Buckley, sophomore computer science major

“It depends on the context; if it’s related to the class and not distracting it’s fine because they’re either saying things that I hadn’t thought about or they’re giving information that I actually need. A lot of times they’re just trying to debate with the teacher or whatever so it can be distracting.”

Tim Baxter

Tim Baxter, senior international business major

I like them and dislike them. Sometimes they really can start discussions and get the ball rolling and I guess sometimes they can really stop the ball just by talking about something that really has nothing to do with the topic and going off on a tangent.

Daniel Barth

Daniel Barth, freshman marketing major

“It can be distracting for the class when one person (is) always rambling on and you’re trying to be productive and get stuff done and you already know this person is going to start talking. It’s not something that you can’t work around but it can get annoying sometimes.”

0 734

‘Tis the season for holiday shopping, finding the perfect gifts and holiday cheer. As holiday shoppers are rushing through the mall this month, they will most likely hear a seasonal greeting from a retail employee.

However, two simple phrases, “Happy holidays” versus “Merry Christmas” have sparked massive debate in recent years.

It’s two words. Boycotting a store because the company chose to say “Happy holidays” or yelling at a retail employee for wishing a “Merry Christmas” is quite ridiculous and honestly unnecessary.

Companies must choose one or the other. By saying “Merry Christmas,” companies are ostracized for being insensitive to other religious affiliations. By wishing a customer “Happy holidays” instead, criticism arises for following a liberal agenda.

As of 2010, 3 out of 4 Americans claim Christianity as their belief system. While this is a majority, this excludes almost 25 percent of possible customers ready to spend big bucks for presents.

The American Family Association, an organization who promotes fundamentalist Christian ideals, fights big-name retailers who switch to the politically correct term, and encourages their readers to boycott companies and demand “Merry Christmas.”

For other companies, saying “Happy holidays” is not only being politically correct—it opens the possibility to make a larger profit by trying to appeal to every belief system.

Here’s the truth though: Many Americans don’t care.

In 2013, a study by the Pew Research Center found 8 out of 10 non-Christians celebrate Christmas in the United States. It’s a safe bet that companies aren’t taking a large risk by saying “Merry Christmas” if the Christmas shopping crowd is so large.

Yet, despite the vast majority celebrating Christmas this year, so much emphasis is put on the issue.

In another study conducted by the Pew Research Center, nearly half of Americans don’t have a preference for which seasonal greeting they receive.

Approximately 42 percent said they preferred “Merry Christmas” while the remaining 12 percent prefer “Happy Holidays.”

The whole concept of Christmas, Kwanzaa, Hanukkah and every other holiday celebration in between is about love, tradition and spending time with family.

Focusing on such a simplistic issue draws attention away from the real meaning of the season for many cultures.

Don’t be an Ebenezer Scrooge and bring bah-humbug to the joy of the holidays by focusing on such a petty issue.

Tear open the presents, indulge in vast amounts of food and enjoy time with family and friends.

0 573

When The Arbiter asked 50 undergraduate students if they felt they were able to take on all the responsibilities of being an adult, 39 said they did not feel fully prepared. Knowing how to perform the basic duties of being an adult such as managing finances, insurance plans and student loans is crucial knowledge to have when heading into

Once students graduate  high school, they should be prepared for adult life.

High schools often fail to properly teach students skills that are necessary to have as an
independent adult.

If these skills are not taught during high school,  the last step before expected independence, students should be taught these skills during college to better prepare them for the real world.

Repurposing UF classes to focus on teaching the basic principles of adulthood would be more effective in helping students in the real world.

“Maybe they (universities) expect you to know already or don’t consider it school-worthy,” said Andrew Stone, junior psychology major. “If you look at how many kids buy with credit cards and don’t know how to use a credit card, or how many kids buy houses and have no idea how a mortgage works, you can see that there is some important knowledge missing there.”

Of the 50 students mentioned previously, 48 of them stated that they would prefer UF courses that taught the basics of being an adult instead of the current curriculum.

UF courses focus on topics ranging from storytelling to invention and discovery.

“If you’re going to have a university foundations class, I think it should be more applicable,” Stone said. “It’s pretty obvious that with everybody who takes those classes that there is no content to them. We could use that space to teach more practical things like basic finances, balancing checkbooks or even cooking.”

The mission for the Foundational Studies Program is to “engage our Boise State University community in a cutting-edge, evidence-based liberal arts education relevant to our continually changing and diverse world.”

According to a four-year study conducted by the U.S. Department of Education, 71 percent of students graduating in 2012 had student loan debt, with the average debt amount being $24,000.

If students are graduating with thousands of dollars in debt, students need to be equipped with the skills to handle their finances.

“Doing taxes is more relevant to my world than storytelling,” said Beth Alderink, senior speech pathology major. “There should be a personal finance class where I can learn what a 401k is and how to set a budget.”

0 1118
Bryan Talbot / The Arbiter

Smith2424. Incorrect. Alligator3. Incorrect.

Whatever your password is, sharing it might strengthen your relationship.

By sharing your password you are creating a more trusting environment with your significant other. This ultimately leads to a stronger, happier relationship.

A recent study done by The Pew Research Center showed that individuals were more comfortable sharing passwords with significant others than they had been before.

In a survey of 2,000 individuals in committed relationships, 67 percent said they shared passwords to online accounts such as Netflix or Amazon with their partners.

However, only 27 percent of couples will go so far as to have a joint email account.

My personal experience  shows that sharing your password will strengthen your relationship and this mentality and practice is growing; after all if you want to spend the rest of your life with someone in marriage, shouldn’t you be able to trust them with your Gmail account password?

My boyfriend and I share passwords for the Netflix account to our individual Facebook pages. Since we’ve swapped email passwords, there are no more secrets.

He can see all of my Victoria Secret coupon emails and I can check any of the 30 forwarded emails his dad sends him a day. Our relationship isn’t made up of checks and balances but, if one of us were ever curious about the other, the answer would only be a few clicks away.

Sharing passwords has also made managing our mutual accounts more convenient.

Everything from the water bill to the Internet is managed online; if he needs to check when something is due, he can sign in and check and vice versa.

However, there are a few reasons not to share a password.

One reason could be that the relationship is too new. If you still have emails from your ex-partner in your inbox, the temptation to see how your last relationship worked could be too much for a new girlfriend or boyfriend. Also, do you really want someone you’ve only been seeing for a short time to have access to all your accounts, especially if they involve money?

Another reason not to share is because you are entitled to your own privacy. If you pay your own bills you have earned a right to have a life of your own. You shouldn’t feel obligated to share your password with anyone, even if you are dating them. That said, if someone denies sharing a password, don’t assume it is because they are hiding something.

Lastly, if your significant other is constantly trying to check up on you, maybe you should keep your password to yourself until trust can be built. A relationship can’t survive without trust and sharing a password with someone is the ultimate sign of trust.

While no one should ever feel obligated to share passwords, the benefits range from easier finance access to stronger trust. Despite some negative sides to sharing passwords the strength built in relationships is worth it.

0 1201
Lindee Neumeier
Social Work

It has been ingrained into your brain and you may have never even considered why you say it. You memorized this recitation soon after you enrolled in public school, given that you started your education here in the United States. Know what it is? It’s the Pledge of Allegiance.

From a young age, you are told to stand up, put your right hand over your heart and recite the Pledge. It isn’t until later middle school or early high school when you start to really want to know why the Pledge is recited in school and what the words really mean.

First, we have: “I pledge allegiance,” which simply means that you are declaring that you are loyal to something, be it a person, place (country), or idea. Next: “to the flag, of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands,” this pertains to our country and everything it stands for. Then, we have: “one Nation, under God, indivisible,” which implies that our indivisible nation is religious. And lastly: “with liberty, and justice for all,” which means that we all have freedoms and that we are fair to all of our citizens. Overall, this seems like a good thing to teach our children at a young age.

However, there are five words which seem to be contradictory.

“One Nation, under God, indivisible” is a discerning (sic) phrase to me and any other American that identifies with being non-religious. This is because to be “under God,” and to be “indivisible” don’t add up in our “one Nation.” Our current Pledge states that our one nation, our whole country, is “under God,”which isn’t true. If it isn’t true, why do we state this in our Pledge today?

Ken Lynn, an active Air Force member and Freedom From Religion Foundation member, explains that during the Red Scare of the 1950s, the whole nation was panicked about the spread of communism, which in its definition is implied to be anti-religious as well as anti-freedom.

The citizens of the United States as well as Congress decided that they had to make a large scale declaration of our nation being against communism. So, in 1954, Congress voted to add the words “under God” in our Pledge. However, 60 years have gone by, and America is becoming less religiously affiliated.

In 2012, Pew Research claimed that, “The number of Americans who do not identify with any religion also has grown in recent years; indeed, about one-fifth of the public overall – and a third of adults under age 30 – are religiously unaffiliated as of 2012”.

If this is the case, then why do we declare that our nation is religious as a whole? We need to correct our current pledge for it to be true. You can help do this by writing to your school districts, state legislature or even Congress. We need to right this wrong for future generations of Americans.

0 776

Clay Schoessler

America prides itself in giving every person the opportunity to receive a quality post-secondary education. But is this really true? In this country, most students struggle to afford a college education. What changes can be made to our system? As American citizens and tax payers, we hold the power to tell the government what to do and when to do it. Well America, now is the time for post-secondary reform.

Having little money growing up made me think more consciously. By my freshman year in high school, I knew that my best chance to get a good quality education was by earning scholarships. Four years later, I had my college tuition paid for with several scholarships. However, most students are not this fortunate.  Every year, hundreds of students are driven into debt by the outrageous cost of attending a post-secondary institution.

Only a few years ago, a middle class family could afford college savings. Sadly, I know few people who are able to do this today.

According to the College Savings Foundation, 63 percent of parents count on their kids to carry the debt they acquire in college. These students in turn rely on help from the government, which then puts more burden on the taxpayer.

With outrageous government spending and a failing monetary system, it’s no wonder that our educational system has fallen through the cracks.

According to the U.S. National Debt Clock, fewer people are in the workforce today than in 2000. Each year the number of people and families on welfare increases.

According to USA Today, the average student debt in 2000 was $17,000 compared to a whopping $30,000 today. These facts paint a very bleak picture for a once great nation based on the principles of self-sovereignty and democracy.

The solution to the problem of student debt cannot be addressed from any one smaller perspective. The issue is multi-faceted and can only be successfully tackled by looking at the whole of our nation and asking the question of what do we, the people of this country, want for our children and our future? We need to invest in ourselves.

European countries invest in their future by paying for the student’s college through taxes.

Raising taxes is an ugly situation and nobody likes them. They are tricky and Americans already feel like they’re paying through the nose in them, but as a young adult of the lower class income bracket, I am able to realize that this is a possible solution.

I think we should institute a tax law to help pay for the cost of attendance at a post-secondary institution. It’s hard enough to afford anything right now, but bear with me.

In my opinion, the opportunity to have an affordable and quality education should be the right of every citizen in our country.

We need to exercise our ability and our responsibility to seeing that our nation’s priorities are sustainable for the future of our people and our country.

0 862
Arbiter Graphic

“No, because I think shopping is evil and that it is black magic and that’s why they call it Black Friday and it should be stopped.”

– Daniel Joseph Ryan, sophomore, health science studies

“Yes I do, because they can get way more business that way.”

– Cody Tilley, freshman, mechanical engineering

“No, I don’t like that … I always think of the saying, ‘On Thanksgiving, you’re so thankful and then on Friday, you go and trample people to go get something.’”

– Samantha Cheney, junior, marketing and finance

“It just seems kind of ridiculous. I mean, Thanksgiving is all about family time and it seems like Black Friday has kind of taken over that.”

– Wil Balch, sophomore, mechanical engineering

0 1159

While many will be sitting down for a turkey dinner next Thursday, Kali Ireland, third key holder at Icing Jewelry in the mall, will be working.

She’ll be skipping pumpkin pie to face the masses of shoppers looking for early Black Friday sales.

“I don’t understand why we have to open on Thanksgiving. I think it’s a little bit ridiculous because they keep making it earlier and earlier every year,” Ireland said.

All the hype for a day of shopping now overshadows the day to be thankful; consumers need to stop participating in early Black Friday shopping or  it will only get worse every year. Not only are shoppers missing out on family time, there is a huge strain on retail employees.

This year is the first time many stores in the mall will be opening for Black Friday shopping on Thanksgiving. Large department stores have been leading the trend in recent years: Stores such as Wal-Mart, Target and Kohl’s released Black Friday advertisements in the beginning of November this year.

“Thanksgiving is time to be with family and not go out and fight people off to get really awesome deals,” Ireland said.

Not only do employees have to cut family time, they will have to work extra hours. It is exhausting for workers who already have to deal with the stress of  angry, aggressive Black Friday shoppers.

“It’s tough right now … because we’re not fully staffed. There’s only four of us working at the store, so we all have to work double shifts and a couple of us have to work triple shifts,” Ireland said.

Despite the toll on retail employees, consumers continue to participate in the retail festivities.

Although junior biology major Kristen Chamberlin won’t be shopping on Thanksgiving, she believes shoppers should have the option.

“I think (stores) should be open. I feel like people, if they want to go out and shop, they should have the opportunity,” Chamberlin said.

People shopping on Thanksgiving indirectly support unnecessary consumerism.

Others protest the concept. Facebook pages such as “Boycott Shopping on Thanksgiving” try to persuade the public to let retail employees enjoy the holiday.

“I think everybody should have Thanksgiving off at least to eat with their family,” said Caitlin Fovenyessy, junior kinesiology major. “I know Black Friday is like a big tradition for a lot of people…but on Thanksgiving Day, (stores) shouldn’t be open.”

Ultimately, consumers are the driving force behind the cultural phenomenon. While they’re getting great deals, retail workers are ultimately the ones paying the price.

0 931

On Nov. 4, Idaho failed to elect change. Midterm elections proved Idaho is stuck in its Republican ways when the people of this state reelected 72 year-old Gov. C. L. “Butch” Otter, for a third term, instead of Democratic candidate A.J. Balukoff.

Tweets and Facebook posts cried snippets of outrage and disappointment. Sentiments are still echoed throughout campus. Some students felt Balukoff had a strong chance of winning, a rarity in one of the reddest states in the country.

Benedetta Torsi, senior Spanish major, said she could not vote because she is not a U.S. citizen, but she is upset with the outcome of last week’s elections.

“It’s very frustrating because I didn’t have an active part in voting and the results are even more frustrating,” Torsi said. “I don’t like Republicans. I was excited to see change.”

Idaho will never change short of a political apocalypse. Idaho’s neighbors to the west may be blue, but their ways will not cross the border.

Otter took 54 percent of the votes while Balukoff took 39 percent. Boise State Public Radio reported Ada County was Balukoff’s biggest supporter with 51.4 percent of the votes—almost 11,000 more votes than Otter.

Despite these victories and Balukoff’s popularity in Ada County, political science professor Scott Yeanor said Balukoff never stood a chance.

According to Yeanor, while the governor race was reportedly close, that was actually never the case.

“Democrats are irrelevant in Idaho. And they’ll continue to be irrelevant,” Yeanor said. “They have almost no power in the Legislature and, absent a great scandal, the Republicans will win state-wide office. The superintendent of schools election shows that. The Republicans ran a stiff in that election and won.”

For Yeanor, the political conversation that should be taking place is if one-party rule is a good thing for a state. Idaho has had Republican governor control for a long time and Republican legislature control even longer. Yeanor said, generally speaking, long term one-party rule can become more like a collection of interests instead of a party of ideas. When that happens, every once in a while having an electoral defeat can be rejuvenating for the party, where normal partnership and relationships are broken up.

“It’s a question whether one-party rule, even democratically accountable one-party rule, is good in the long term,” Yeanor said. “A lot of interests end up growing around a party that holds an office that holds and it becomes less true to itself over time and so I think all Idaho citizens should be concerned
about that.”

0 738


Adiya Jaffari

Adiya Jaffari, senior pre-med health-science major

“I think I’m a bit disappointed that more people who wanted change didn’t vote. It’s interesting to think about because I know a lot of people didn’t vote for Otter. I think the younger generation is more liberal, but there is less voter turnout in that group. They’re upset with the government. You don’t get to complain if you don’t vote.”

Everett Smith

Everett Smith, junior fine arts major

“I’m happy the fire bond bill passed and I look forward to the construction of new emergency buildings. I wish more of the youth were involved in the political process.”

Orion Vogel

Orion Vogel, sophomore molecular biology major

“I know that Otter won reelection and that’s probably terrible. I don’t support Republicans and Democrats; generally I’m a pretty independent person.”

Christiana Svetkovich

Christiana Svetkovich, senior psychology major

“Iffy, because I think a lot of people aren’t as informed as they could be. I think my biggest problem was probably the education leader this term because she did plagiarize and she did get caught doing some other things she probably shouldn’t have been doing that are not liable and that concerns me. Even though she is Republican, I get that, but she shouldn’t have been doing those things. When you ask questions like did you know this happened no one knows, they’re like, ‘no I just voted for R,’ so that bothers me in the very fact that voters are not very informed.”

Jennifer Stohler

Jennifer Stohler, senior theatre arts and graphic design major

“One of my biggest issues is not only do I agree with (Svetkovich) that people should be more informed instead of just choosing a letter next to a candidate’s name, I also feel some people just don’t go out and vote which also affects the election. People need to go out and vote, do the research and pick a candidate that fits.”