Will it hurt or help Veterans?

Archive

Comments
Story

The GI Bill, or the GI Bill of Rights, provides benefits to veterans, service members and some dependents of disabled or deceased veterans wishing to pursue an education.

For a little history, the GI Bill of Rights is also known as the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944.

It was put into effect after World War II when the World War Adjusted Act of 1924 (or the Bonus Act) made it so veterans wouldn’t see their bonus for  20 years.

Basically Congress screwed over the veterans of the Great Depression with a wormed bill, then Congress came together, debated a bit and, at length, “finalized” it.

Today, there are several chapters of the bill with different agendas linking to educational assistance within  the military.

The latest bill is chapter 33, the Post-9/11 Veteran’s Educational Assistance Act of 2008.

There seems to be a bit of confusion on the new bill and its passing.

And though I’m indirectly associated with the bill as a dependent of the Army – my father’s retired – there doesn’t seem to be any real conundrum, just questions formed from thought provoked rumor.

The main questions arise from the fear that the government will allow soldiers to return home without psychological screening, placing them from the desert to the classroom. The bill will possibly allow them to hurry into school or strip the costs from the psychological studies.

According to R.K. Williams, veterans certification specialist at Boise State, the bill associates with the Department of Veterans Affairs, which isn’t connected with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder screenings or treatments.

“The money allowed to the new GI Bill has nothing to do with Department of Defense or the Veterans Hospital,” Williams said.

He said the V.A. is not going to “outsource the GI Bill.”
Beth Lahny is a soldier in the Navy, a full-time student at Boise State and national promoter for the new GI bill.

It used to be the case, Lahny explains, she received only enough for half of her tuition and some for allowance. The rest was paid in loans. 

She explained the bill pays all of her tuition and allows her an increase in assistance allowances. Plus, before she returned from Iraq, she went  through screening.

I’m not saying, “No Fear! The new GI bill is here!” but it doesn’t seem the government has any hidden agenda as to decreasing mental health screenings to their veterans.

I would hope the government provides mentally unstable war veterans the health care they deserve rather than take money from that specific agenda.

Sounds a bit crooked, but I completely understand where the idea came from in terms of our history toward our veterans.

JESSICA HENDERSON
Arbiter Journalist

Related Posts:

  1. Land of the Free
  2. Boise State honors veterans
  3. Student, soldier fights for her education
  4. Schools prepare for more students studying under GI Bill
  5. Letters to the Editor
Filed under: OPINION — Archive @ 12:00 am November 10th, 2008

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

Comments
Comments
Subscribe
Subscribe
Popular
Popular

The Weekly Buzz Kill: America’s fast track to socialism 23 comment(s) | 159 view(s) per day

Sports Briefs 0 comment(s) | 157 view(s) per day

News Briefs 0 comment(s) | 155 view(s) per day

Opinion 0 comment(s) | 148 view(s) per day

From The Blue to You: Letter to whom it may concern 1 comment(s) | 148 view(s) per day

Faculty senate members walk out after heated debate 0 comment(s) | 119 view(s) per day

Building barriers: Caustic speech inflames non-believers 14 comment(s) | 117 view(s) per day

2009 Heisman race frontrunners 0 comment(s) | 98 view(s) per day

Interview with author Ann Patchett (Part 1 of 2) 1 comment(s) | 97 view(s) per day

The Arbiter's Thanksgiving Photo Competition 0 comment(s) | 96 view(s) per day