Media-fueled hubbub degrades ‘9/11′ debate

Archive

Comments
Story

Before we in the news media began covering “Fahrenheit

9/11” as if it was the second coming of Christ – or

should I say “The Passion of the Christ” – I was

excited about seeing the documentary.

I liked Moore’s previous one, “Bowling for

Columbine,” but now I’m disgusted at how easily TV,

newspapers and magazines have willingly become unpaid marketers for

the film.

The combined results of a controversy-obsessed media, missteps by

some conservative groups, the political climate and Moore’s

strategic marketing prevents most people from seeing

“Fahrenheit” with an open mind. It also helped the

movie take in $23.9 million during the opening weekend.

It reminds me of the brouhaha that overshadowed Mel Gibson’s

“Passion.”

The two-sided debate surrounding both movies tapped into the

insecurity of a country immersed in a war on terror that has no

foreseeable end. Our soldiers and civilians are being killed by an

enemy that fights with as much religious conviction as President

Bush claims to possess. The us-versus-them debate between

Christians and Jews over “Passion,” and between

conservatives and liberals over “Fahrenheit,” kills

thoughtful dialogue.

“You kind of invite them in to create a controversy,”

said Philip Rosen, professor of modern culture and media at Brown

University.

For “Passion,” the media manipulation was transparent.

Gibson let only select people see early screenings of the film, but

in TV and newspaper interviews he spoke out against forces trying

to silence the film. The news media couldn’t get enough.

The road to success for “Fahrenheit” has taken a

similar path.

In early May, Moore announced Disney’s decision not to

distribute “Fahrenheit” weeks before the Cannes Film

Festival, where he won a top award. The announcement created a

flurry of news coverage, with Moore complaining about big

corporations controlling the flow of information. The search for a

new distributor became another news item until Lions Gate Films

agreed to distribute it.

In June, the conservative group Move America Forward urged theaters

not to show the documentary. Two weeks ago, another group, Citizens

United, filed a formal complaint against Moore’s movie with

the Federal Election Commission. It claimed

“Fahrenheit” violates campaign rules.

Bad moves.

“Any attempt at suppressing a movie always inevitably

backfires,” said Norman Ornstein, a political expert at the

American Enterprise Institute.

To counter, the left-leaning MoveOn PAC launched a national

campaign to get at least 100,000 members to see the film. More than

115,000 people pledged to see “Fahrenheit” when it

opened nationwide June 25.

“When the right-wing groups came out and tried to censor the

film, we decided we really needed to defend the film,” said

Adam Ruben, MoveOn’s national field director.

When Lions Gate requested a rating, the Motion Picture Association

of America gave “Fahrenheit” an R for violence and

language. Moore launched an unsuccessful legal battle to get it

changed to PG-13.

But the company isn’t a member of the association and

therefore isn’t required to submit “Fahrenheit”

for a rating, said an association spokesman. For example, another

politically charged documentary, “Super Size Me,” is

unrated.

The question is, why did Lions Gate request a rating in the first

place?

The company declined to comment, but I’m guessing it

wasn’t concerned about helping parents gauge whether

“Fahrenheit” was appropriate for kids. The ratings

battle was another news story.

“All of this really lifted this film to a different level in

terms of coverage,” said Ornstein. “Those things create

the notion that you have a huge controversy.”

It’s another media-stoked uproar that exploits our fear in a

time when fear seems to be all we have.

ABOUT THE WRITER

Tonya Jameson is a columnist for the Charlotte Observer. Readers

may write to her at: Charlotte Observer, 600 South Tryon Street,

Charlotte, N.C. 28202-1880.

onya Jameson
Knight Ridder Newspapers

Related Posts:

  1. “Riddler”: The fake punt that fueled the Broncos to victory
  2. War gets a chance to ‘Waltz’
  3. Fire fueled by spectators’ indecency
  4. Homosexuality is not a debate
  5. Broncos first in preseason media poll
Filed under: OPINION — Archive @ 12:00 am July 14th, 2004

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

Comments
Comments
Subscribe
Subscribe