


Danger Baby strikes back
First of all, it didn’t take you long in your article to
get things wrong. We are a five piece band, which if you more than
grazed the bio or even looked at the picture you would have figured
out. Regardless of this large mistake I was willing to listen to
your critical views. However, much of your review was drowned in
abstract descriptions and moronic soap-boxing. Statements like
“guitar-store-employee-type rock riff” lead me to
believe that somehow someone who works in a guitar store writes a
certain type of guitar lick, which apparently is common and
uninteresting. I never thought someone’s resume had an impact
on how crappy their music was – I always figured people who
worked at music stores were fans of music. Next, you stated our
music had an “overemphasized vocal.” Is it too loud in
the mix, or too layered, or not layered enough? Is it off-key? And
by employing this “overemphasized vocal” how does our
music become boring? Is it repetitious, is it not dynamic enough,
does it have a slim range? You throw out statements like the
previous yet leave the band and the readers wondering exactly what
is amiss. If we are bad, compare us to a similarly
“dimming” band, or at least explain yourself. The sole
purpose of a music review is to provide readers with an idea of a
band or musician’s sound. Instead you have managed to
completely circumnavigate this goal with reasoning contradictory to
your very purpose as a critic (to which I will address further
down). Rather than defend or explain your distaste for Danger Baby,
you take time out to attack Northwest Music Online. You claim that
“other bands” – which you admit you haven’t
heard – are more deserving of a “band of the
month” title. Unsupported statements like that make me feel
like a victim of musical McCarthyism. Then, not only do you bash
Northwest Music Online, you go on to bash places we’ve played
by calling them “local dives.” I am sure the owners and
patrons of the Eastside Tavern, Tom Grainey’s and J.T. Toads,
Club Savvys, Bogies, Boise State University, etc. are happy to be
included in such an unflattering statement. You criticize us for
taking ourselves too seriously, but then you rip us for playing at
places that are apparently a joke to you. You tell us that we
should make music that we like – which we do – and we
should have no expectations of succeeding, yet you set several
(poorly derived) expectations. Why are we being crucified for
having goals? We don’t feel we deserve fame simply because we
put together a press packet, and you are an arrogant dolt for
making such a leap. It’s obvious you hardly know us, our
goals, or even how many people are in our band. You see Brian,
you’ve lost yourself in a very contradictory type of social
venting. You cannot become a victim of mass media (MTV, radio,
etc.) without becoming an advocate of it – which you are as a
newspaper editor. You cannot even conceive what good or bad music
is without using what you’ve heard and seen as a weighing
mechanism. I thank the mass media, MTV included, for providing me
with an opportunity to reach outside of Boise, Idaho to shape my
taste in music. I don’t have to like everything I hear, but I
am grateful to hear it. Through media, I have developed a better
understanding of what I like and dislike and why. I am a fan of
music, and I reject the idea that Danger Baby is in the wrong for
taking pride in what we do, for setting goals, or even seeking
success. You take the easy way out when you jump to the conclusion
that we think we are superstars or we deserve fame. You claim we
shouldn’t care what other people think, but in your ranting
you overstep a very fine line. Part of taking pride in what you do
is finding the point at which your ideas and art can improve, and
become a part of other people’s lives; I have concluded from
your article that we didn’t achieve this goal with you, but I
think it is ignorant and unfair to criticize us for simply
attempting it.
Greg Sasser
Danger Baby Guitarist
A&E editor a ‘whining hack’
Brian Mayer is a ranting idiot, with little if any knowledge of
music. Besides the fact that he dismissed the band Danger Baby
without hearing them live, he uses his article as launching point
for a ridiculous argument. His claim that kids playing guitars take
rock n’ roll too seriously is about as meaningful as his
so-called experience with “many bands.” My bet is that
Brian-in his expertise – is nothing more than a whining hack
incapable of appreciating or recognizing real talent. The least his
broke ass could of done was gone to a Danger Baby show before
making such a bold claim.
Jason MacFarlane
Maybe Brian Mayer is the one in need of growing
up…
Mr. Mayer’s uneducated “review” of rock band
Danger Baby is a blatantly rude, immature opinion that was way out
of line. Until today I was considering offering him a simultaneous
news slot to post to our news column… but ethnocentric ranting
gets you nowhere in a business set up to support all music, not
just what you get wet to.
Starting at the beginning, the “quartet” Mayer
speaks of actually includes five (5) members. So, he obviously
didn’t even take the time to look at the so-called
“nice and very informative” press packet he received.
He completely missed the lead vocalist, Seth, whose vocal styling
and lyrics he called “cheesy, raspy, and
over-emphasized.”
Secondly, Danger Baby’s name doesn’t have to make
sense for them to be a legitimate band. Name one band, whose name
makes sense…then again, perhaps it does make sense, and dear
Brian is too uneducated to get it, who knows. As for being generic;
if you hate it, it can’t be generic.
music,” which is a category that Danger Baby does NOT fall
into. This fills us in on what Brian’s favorite type of music
is. Thus, explaining his warped and ethnocentric opinions about
music as a whole. If the only form of music he thinks exists and is
legitimate is pop, of course Danger Baby is going to be crap, as is
any form of rock music, followed by punk, country, classical, and
basically anything that’s not pop.
Skipping quickly to the end of Mr. Mayer’s article, he
says, “…have no expectations, success in music does
not depend on record deals or press reviews, if you like what you
do then you are successful.” This statement alone contradicts
everything his article is based on. He bashes the guitarist, the
lyrics and vocalist, the album as a whole and even goes as far as
to bash their name. Yet he says if you’re a musician doing
what you love and having a good time, you’re a successful
band…well, in my opinion, Danger Baby is the epitome of a
successful band following those guidelines. This being why Danger
Baby has been ‘Band of the Month’ on Northwest Music
Online…and yes, perhaps more than once.
Which brings me to the basis for my whole rebuttal to
Brian’s article…I’m the marketing director for
Northwest Music Online (
“http://www.northwestmusiconline.com” target= “_new”>www.northwestmusiconline.com
question that blatantly slanders our company; NO, neither are we,
in any way, the parents of, or are we run by, the band Danger Baby.
The band of the month is chosen by our founder monthly and based
usually on some accomplishment a band has made and that he deems
noticeable or worthy (i.e. a new member, a new album release,
etc.).
Sometimes it’s just what he’s in the mood for.
Either way, just as The Arbiter allows Mr. Mayer to publish his
ridiculous opinion, we are allowed to promote whom we chose. No
matter how angered I am by the amount of slander involved, thanks
for the name dropping, Mr. Mayer; our site hits went up twofold
since you mentioned us just this morning. Our site is basically run
by and for bands. Our goal is to get bands seen and heard in an
unbiased and all encompassing way. Any band and any form of music,
from any location, is able to sign up on our website. Band listings
are free of charge to all bands in the Northwest (Idaho, Oregon,
Washington). It makes a great avenue to keep bands in touch with
each other, with fellow musicians, and with recording studios,
press pack opportunities, venues/bars, and the music loving
populous of the world. Besides band listings, we have classifieds,
news, and events calendars, an online radio station, and much
more.
I am a BSU student, and was appalled when I picked up a copy my
school’s paper. Not only was an entire half of the 5th page
dedicated to biased bashing of a fairly prominent local band, whose
name is rather well know around campus, it also bashed a supportive
local business, NWMO, along with BSU itself. BSU and the Arbiter
should be appalled by its supposed A&E editor, who’s job
is to support local arts and music. The least he could do is take
the time to be fully informed before he spouts off ethnocentric,
immature, uneducated opinions.
Please check out
“_new”>www.dangerbaby.net href=”http://www.northwestmusiconline.com” target= “_new”>www.northwestmusiconline.com “http://www.nwmo.us” target=”_new”>www.nwmo.us
on this band and other local bands. Feel free to email me,
“mailto:bobie@nwmo.us”>bobie@nwmo.us
suggestions, or to get involved with NWMO.
ROCK ON!
Bobie McKelvy
Marketing Director, NWMO
Danger Baby rocks
It seems to me that a review of a band should not end with the
sentence, “Those are my thoughts, I would like to hear
yours.” This implies opinion, which is what this particular
article is, not a review. It is a heavily biased, uninformed,
mediocre attempt at a music review. So, Mr. Mayer, here are my
thoughts, since you are so eager to hear them.
I am a chick. I listen to chick music. I listen to feminist
folk/rock music. I listen to Ani, I listen to Tori Amos, I listen
to Bitch and Animal. I generally don’t listen to the type of
music that Danger Baby plays. However, I do listen to Danger Baby,
because I’ve gone to a few of their live shows and, honestly,
they rock. I am open enough to attempt to experience music outside
of my “type,” which it seems you, Mr. Mayer, are unable
to do.
Danger Baby has a wide range of talent and diversity in their
songs. I have not heard the demo in question, but I’m sure if
you were to list the songs that were included (there were three,
not an arduous task, I’m sure) and perhaps comment on them
individually (a little trick most reviewers attempt to use, you
know, commenting on the actual music you listened to as opposed to
music as an industry), I could probably add my own blurb about each
song.
I do know that “We Charge for Water” was included on
this demo you heard, and had you listened to it more closely you
might have commented, on a musical side, that there is a section
near the beginning that shifts from a hard rock sound to an almost
electric folk sound back to an almost desperate hard rock sound.
This distinguishes it from their other songs. And this is only one
example of a distinguishing feature of a song.
Additionally, had you listened to the lyrics, you would have
noticed the metaphorical value and clarity of thought in “We
Charge.”
Perhaps what is confusing to you is that each song has the same
lead singer, or the same drummer, or the same bass player, lead
guitar, rhythm guitar. Well, let me let you in on a little secret
– each song on the demo was recorded by the same band. Eddie
Vedder was lead on all of Pearl Jam’s songs, and some of them
sound similar, but each song is different. There will of course be
similarities between the songs – they are written and
performed by the same people. I imagine if I use this article as a
gauge of your talent, I can make the inference that each of your
subsequent articles will be the same mediocre, close-minded
drivel.
So, for anyone who is interested in actually forming their own
opinions instead of taking Mr. Mayer’s opinion as the gospel
truth, go to
“_new”>www.dangerbaby.net
or they will be playing Face Off November 13 at Boise State.
Patri Ann Thompson