


With the price of higher education soaring, one congressman has
a controversial plan to steady costs. Rep. Howard McKeon
(R–Calif.), who heads a House subcommittee on
higher-education policy, recently introduced a bill that would cap
tuition increases at twice the rate of consumer inflation.
Any tuition increases over that rate would require an
explanation to the U.S. Department of Education and a written plan
on how the offending institution would keep future tuition
increases down. Institutions that violated the cap would be
penalized, and their eligibility for federal student financial aid
would be jeopardized.
McKeon is brave to try to find a solution to the skyrocketing
cost of higher education. Tuitions have risen 75 percent in the
last decade – up to an average $18,273 a year for private
institutions and $4,081 a year for public institutions. And that
doesn’t include a panoply of other charges on one’s
college bill. So an increasing number of students have to hold
full-time jobs during college or graduate with oppressive debt.
But Congressman McKeon is wrong to apply a fiscal straitjacket
without taking a more comprehensive look at higher education.
At public institutions, rising tuitions stem largely from
state-budget shortfalls, resulting from recession-reduced tax
revenue and, in some states, shortsighted tax cuts. At private
institutions, rising costs reflect students’ willingness to
pay for top-notch facilities and professors, and such investment,
supported by private demand, generally benefits society.
Surely, most institutions could find more cost-effective methods
if they were pressed to do so. But if tuition caps are imposed on
them, they will probably jettison less popular, though not less
worthy, programs, and reduce investment in long-term projects. Our
colleges and universities are the envy of the world because of
their extraordinary facilities and minds: Mandatory caps could
strike at the institutions’ ability to maintain such
excellence.
While public institutions are still relatively affordable for
middle-class Americans, too many private institutions are not. For
years, governments have dealt with this situation through a robust
financial-aid program. Students (or, usually, their parents) who
could afford the rising tuitions paid them, and in the process
helped finance improvements in higher education. Students who
couldn’t pay received financial aid from the federal and
state governments and the private sector.
A way to make college more affordable is simply to provide more
government support for students at both public and private
institutions. Education is one of the most worthwhile investments
that governments can make, in terms of the future strength of the
economy and of society in general. But at the same time, colleges
and universities must be encouraged to be more efficient. One of C.
Northcote Parkinson’s laws, “Expenditure rises to meet
income,’’ is all too apparent in America’s
colleges.
In any event, an affordable and prestigious network of public
and private colleges and universities, which we all want, simply
cannot be accomplished without significant government support.
Providence Journal