Nuclear waste cleanup should be INEEL’s top job

Archive

Comments
Story

Meeting in Idaho Falls last month, the INEEL Citizens Advisory

Board learned that cleaning up nuclear waste-until recently Job One

at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory-has

slipped to fifth among the goals in the Site’s new role as

“the nation’s leading center for nuclear energy

research and development.” A week later, Sen. Larry Craig

announced a plan to spend more than $1 billion of taxpayer money to

develop an “advanced” reactor at INEEL.

Developing new nuclear energy technologies clearly is ranked far

above cleaning up the Cold War mess contaminating the Snake River

Aquifer at INEEL. Power once “too cheap to meter” is

now touted as “clean, abundant, affordable and reliable

energy.” But that’s not a good enough bet for private

industry to do its own research and development. Because no

market-accountable institutions will do so, taxpayers would assume

the economic risk and foot the bill for the “next

generation” atomic energy adventure, including cleanup of the

newly produced radioactive waste.

At the Snake River Alliance, we believe that the priority should

be to clean up the environmental problems created by past nuclear

energy and weapons production, such as the millions of cubic feet

of buried plutonium-contaminated waste at INEEL. We don’t

believe more radioactive waste should be created. We believe that

energy conservation and renewable energy sources are the best ways

to meet energy needs. We do not support building new nuclear power

reactors.

As Idaho’s nuclear watchdog, in recent years the Alliance

has focused on problems of nuclear waste storage and treatment at

INEEL. We helped stop construction of a nuclear waste incinerator

and have raised public awareness of the danger posed to

Idaho’s water by the waste in the ground above the Snake

River Aquifer. There is still much work to be done before

Idaho’s nuclear waste is safely managed, and we will continue

to work with the people of Idaho to ensure the job is done.

Meanwhile, the nuclear industry has increased public relations

to promote nuclear power. Lobbying efforts accompanied by large

campaign contributions pressure government to pay for what private

investors will not. INEEL’s mission was changed recently from

nuclear waste cleanup to research and development of the next

generation of nuclear reactors. This puts INEEL and Idaho at the

center of the debate over the future of nuclear power.

The economics of atomic power have never justified the vast

investment made by this nation in nuclear energy research and

development. If over the past 50 years we had focused as much of

our technical expertise and financial resources on conservation,

improved energy efficiency, and serious development of alternative

energy resources, there would be no threat of an energy crisis.

When all costs are taken into account-mining and processing

uranium fuel, building and operating nuclear plants, containing the

radioactivity, storing huge amounts of dangerous waste and dealing

with immense safety, security and health issues-atomic power is no

bargain, even with more than $1 trillion in government subsidies

that accompanied its development and continue to prop it up.

Indeed, the nuclear industry has survived until now only because of

those massive subsidies, and not a single new US nuclear plant has

been ordered since the ‘70s.

With this new proposal, we are to believe that a design yet to

be determined will have solved the radioactive waste and safety

problems of past reactors, and it will all be accomplished by 2010!

Idaho already has thousands of tons of radioactive waste sitting

above the Snake River Aquifer from commercial reactors, the nuclear

navy, nuclear weapons production and other sources. We don’t

need any more!


Gary Richardson is executive director of the

Snake River Alliance, an Idaho-based grassroots group working

through research, education, and community advocacy for peace and

justice, the end of nuclear weapons production activities, and

responsible solutions to nuclear waste and

contamination.

 

 

 

 

Gary Richardson, Snake River Alliance

Related Posts:

  1. Activists keep tabs on nuclear waste
  2. Idaho’s nuclear watchdog celebrates
    25 years with symposium at BSU
  3. Students get credit for environmental action
  4. Environmental groups attack radioactive waste reclassification plan
  5. Nuclear delegates attend Global 2007 on the Grove
Filed under: OPINION — Archive @ 12:00 am April 10th, 2003

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

Comments
Comments
Subscribe
Subscribe
Popular
Popular

Faculty senate members walk out after heated debate 0 comment(s) | 230 view(s) per day

The Weekly Buzz Kill: America’s fast track to socialism 17 comment(s) | 221 view(s) per day

From The Blue to You: Letter to whom it may concern 1 comment(s) | 219 view(s) per day

The Arbiter's Thanksgiving Photo Competition 0 comment(s) | 182 view(s) per day

Sports Briefs 0 comment(s) | 169 view(s) per day

News Briefs 0 comment(s) | 167 view(s) per day

Opinion 0 comment(s) | 159 view(s) per day

Building barriers: Caustic speech inflames non-believers 14 comment(s) | 149 view(s) per day

2009 Heisman race frontrunners 0 comment(s) | 142 view(s) per day

Lights on: Let's be honest here 0 comment(s) | 108 view(s) per day