Homosexuality is not a moral issue

Archive

Comments
Story

In response to ‘Straight Talk On Homosexuality’:

When people talk to me about the moral issues surrounding

homosexuality I usually respond with a kind but firm, “There

are no moral issues surrounding homosexuality and please get with

the 21st century.”

Jared Kenning’s March 10 editorial in The Arbiter suggests

that he has never had an openly gay or lesbian person in his life

that he could view as happy, successful and without the need for

his moral judgment.

Moral conservatives in this country would have you believe that

gay and lesbian people are miserable, and are just waiting to be

enlightened by the right religious group, thus changing them into

morally “straight” Americans. Would it surprise moral

conservatives like Kenning that I’ve been openly homosexual

for 15 of my 36 years and am just as happy and content as my

heterosexual peers? That perhaps he misjudges the lure of the happy

heterosexual life he hopes to “convert” me to?

Even if I believed that my homosexuality isn’t hereditary

(despite nearly a dozen happy homos all over my father’s side

of the family over the years), many of Mr. Kenning’s

conclusions are simplistic. The American Psychiatric Association

has officially declared reparative therapy for homosexuals

unethical.

Let’s share with you the official statement from the APA

on ex-gay therapy: “The potential risks of ‘reparative

therapy’ are great, including depression, anxiety and

self-destructive behavior, since therapist alignment with societal

prejudices against homosexuality may reinforce self-hatred already

experienced by the patient. Many patients who have undergone

‘reparative therapy’ relate that they were inaccurately

told that homosexuals are lonely, unhappy individuals who never

achieve acceptance or satisfaction. The possibility that the person

might achieve happiness and satisfying interpersonal relationships

as a gay man or lesbian is not presented, nor are alternative

approaches to dealing with the effects of societal stigmatization

discussed … the APA opposes any psychiatric treatment, such as

‘reparative’ or ‘conversion’ therapy which

is based on the assumption that homosexuality per se is a mental

disorder or based on a prior assumption that the patient should

change his/her sexual orientation.”

The APA’s condemnation of ex-gay therapy is based on the

fact that such therapy is prejudiced and often backed by people who

are seeking to apply their moral standard on someone else’s

life. The problem I personally have with ex-gay therapy and those

who think it’s a viable treatment is that I am hardly a

lonely, unhappy person without acceptance or satisfaction.

I have been with my partner for seven years. We have a nice

house on a corner lot by the Boise River. My partner attends

functions with me regarding my work, we own two cars, have two

terriers and pay taxes.

His family loves me and my family loves him. Our neighbors stop

and chat with us as we work in the garden. We have straight

couples, gay couples and transgender couples in our lives. We have

single straight friends who don’t feel threatened or

uncomfortable.

My question for Mr. Kenning is: What is it about homosexuality

that scares you so much? Are gay people in your life asking you to

convert to homosexuality because you seem so lonely and unhappy and

incapable of acceptance or satisfaction?

Mr. Kenning makes an excellent point at the end of his article

when he says, “Change, though extremely difficult (but

perhaps extremely rewarding), is possible.” Clearly that is a

profound and powerful statement.

Isn’t it interesting, however, that he is so worried about

offering others the ability to discover his moral conservativeness?

Perhaps he could take the time to understand why a gay person might

not want to submit to conservative 19th century morality and

perhaps change his need to want to change other people.

The great thing about America, despite bigotry and homophobia,

is that we are free to be exactly who we want to be. No movement,

no matter how morally “right” it claims to be, has the

right to judge other Americans unworthy of life, liberty and the

pursuit of happiness.

Bob McDiarmid, Boise

Related Posts:

  1. Continuing the debate about homosexuality
  2. Straight talk on homosexuality
  3. Homosexuality tied to genetics, researchers say
  4. Homosexuality and the family
  5. Kenning’s guilty of gross generalizations
Filed under: OPINION — Archive @ 12:00 am March 17th, 2003

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

Comments
Comments
Subscribe
Subscribe
Popular
Popular

Faculty senate members walk out after heated debate 0 comment(s) | 225 view(s) per day

From The Blue to You: Letter to whom it may concern 1 comment(s) | 219 view(s) per day

The Weekly Buzz Kill: America’s fast track to socialism 17 comment(s) | 213 view(s) per day

The Arbiter's Thanksgiving Photo Competition 0 comment(s) | 181 view(s) per day

Sports Briefs 0 comment(s) | 167 view(s) per day

News Briefs 0 comment(s) | 166 view(s) per day

Opinion 0 comment(s) | 158 view(s) per day

Building barriers: Caustic speech inflames non-believers 14 comment(s) | 149 view(s) per day

2009 Heisman race frontrunners 0 comment(s) | 141 view(s) per day

Lights on: Let's be honest here 0 comment(s) | 107 view(s) per day